HL vs Taigen Metal Tracks

If you have a tank query and you can't find the answer anywhere else, post here. (TIP - Check for answers in FAQ, use the 'search' facility or even check this board before posting here).
Forum rules
If your question is electronics related please post it in one of the relevant boards here: viewforum.php?f=31
User avatar
Jimster
Lieutenant
Posts: 3379
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2018 1:51 am
Location: Illinois

Re: HL vs Taigen Metal Tracks

Post by Jimster »

Thanks, Tom. I was wondering what the specific differences are.
User avatar
RenoirLV
Corporal
Posts: 327
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:58 pm
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: HL vs Taigen Metal Tracks

Post by RenoirLV »

tomhugill wrote:Henglong tracks are open pin, so the pins are only enclosed at either end. On taigen tracks they are closed pin, the pins are fully enclosed. This makes them stronger. They also have open guide horns like the real thing, where HL are solid.
I have heard this explanation but I never got it. I have taigen tracks. The pins are easy to remove and they stay in very well. Unlike those of Mato that tend to slide out when loose and very hard to remove when not loose. Quite annoying.

Sent from my POCOPHONE F1 using Tapatalk
Started as a tank man.
2x early Tiger 1's made from parts of HL, Taigen, Mato and whatever I saw suitable.
Ural 4320 (~1/12)
WPL B36 Ural
Post Reply

Return to “General Questions”