Re: Mato Sherman pics

Feel free to discuss anything and everything to do with tanking here!
User avatar
[ICE]monkey
2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 2669
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:58 pm
Location: pluckley ,ashford ,kent

Re: Mato Sherman pics

Post by [ICE]monkey »

Mad Fox wrote: nice, wouldn't mind one to go up against my Tiger :D
you need four , even six to go up against one tiger  ;D ;D
on second thoughts lets not go to Camelot ,it is a silly place
971wright
2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 2733
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:16 pm
Location: nelson Lancashire

Re: Mato Sherman pics

Post by 971wright »

I want it now lots off them gimmie gimmie gimmie when when when are we nearly there yet

pete
Ex_Pat_Tanker
Warrant Officer 1st Class
Posts: 1557
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:24 am
Location: Wixom MI USA

Re: Mato Sherman pics

Post by Ex_Pat_Tanker »

Sounds like they are pretty close - according to Swath they've built the first batch and are busy testing them to see what falls off...
971wright
2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 2733
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:16 pm
Location: nelson Lancashire

Re: Mato Sherman pics

Post by 971wright »

Hi Guys This has helped me make my mind up about what to do with the covers on my Firefly.Im going to do it them the quick way as they will be changed as soon as the kit comes from Mato.So just going to paint and fit them as a stopgap till they release the kit.
#
regards pete
Ex_Pat_Tanker
Warrant Officer 1st Class
Posts: 1557
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:24 am
Location: Wixom MI USA

Re: Mato Sherman pics

Post by Ex_Pat_Tanker »

Latest nugget of info from Swath:
There are 4 being considered for the next release.

In historical order they are:

M3 Lee
M10 Tank Destroyer
Sherman IC Firefly
M4A3E2 Jumbo
I need an M3 to square off against all my DAK armour - Who's with me ;) ;D ;D
Last edited by Ex_Pat_Tanker on Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ex_Pat_Tanker
Warrant Officer 1st Class
Posts: 1557
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:24 am
Location: Wixom MI USA

Re: Mato Sherman pics

Post by Ex_Pat_Tanker »

Firefly Ic looks like its winning the "what is the next release" poll: http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_87021 ... tm#8703396
or http://www.geocities.com/swathdiver/ShermanPoll.html for non RCU users ;)

I've enquired about the HVSS upgrade kits, awaiting Swathdiver's response...
971wright
2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 2733
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:16 pm
Location: nelson Lancashire

Re: Mato Sherman pics

Post by 971wright »

Hi Hope Swathy comes back with good news about the suspension units  and they have loads made ready I can see these selling like hot cakes.Have also voted for the M3 .

regards pete
User avatar
Mackem
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 752
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 4:22 am
Location: Sunderland

Re: Mato Sherman pics

Post by Mackem »

I voted for the M3 Lee, and then started to mull over how they are going to fit elevation & rotation units for both the commanders turret and the main armament into the hull. Has anyone seen an M3 conversion using the tamiya sherman?

Here's hoping
John
HE/HL Leopard 2-A5, HL Pz IV-F1, HL Jagdpanther (WIP), M26A1 Pershing (WIP), HL Pz III M (WIP), Bandai Hummel (WIP)
Ex_Pat_Tanker
Warrant Officer 1st Class
Posts: 1557
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:24 am
Location: Wixom MI USA

Re: Mato Sherman pics

Post by Ex_Pat_Tanker »

I've seen pictures posted on RCU a couple of years ago I think, but I'm damned if I can find them now. It wasn't a build thread, just a bunch of pics of somebodies mate's collection. I seem to recall the guy had perfected his own VVSS but wasn't inclined to go into production with it. Hopefully somebody here saved a link, because RCU's search sucks...
Mad Fox
Corporal
Posts: 324
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 5:13 pm

Re: Mato Sherman pics

Post by Mad Fox »

[ICE]monkey wrote:
Mad Fox wrote: nice, wouldn't mind one to go up against my Tiger :D
you need four , even six to go up against one tiger  ;D ;D
Excellent point Ice, wonder if the missus will go for it lol  ;D ;D
1 H/L Tiger in lots of bits being sorted

"A Tiger gives you a VERY nice Edge"
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”