Mato vs Taigen

If you have a tank query and you can't find the answer anywhere else, post here. (TIP - Check for answers in FAQ, use the 'search' facility or even check this board before posting here).
Forum rules
If your question is electronics related please post it in one of the relevant boards here: viewforum.php?f=31
Post Reply
User avatar
Choobox
Recruit
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2019 3:12 am
Location: Shohola, Pennsylvania USA

Mato vs Taigen

Post by Choobox »

Hi guys, I have a basic question on Mato tanks. I am looking to build a Sherman or a Tiger 1 from parts purchased separately. Looking at a Mato metal Tiger hull to start. In my reading here, Mato and Taigen are basically interchangeable- correct?
Parts are readily available for both, and the Mato metal hull seems like the place to start. Thanks.
No one said nuthin ‘bout lock’n horns with no Tigers-
User avatar
jarndice
Colonel
Posts: 8392
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:27 am
Location: the mountains of hertfordshire

Re: Mato vs Taigen

Post by jarndice »

Absolutely NO Mato have managed to build a Tiger 1 in 1/16 that is almost totally incompatible with Tamiya,Taigen or Heng Long also the metal is of a most dubious quality,
For instance the rear panel of the Mato Tiger 1 has a completely different mounting point to the Hull when compared to the others makers and the front of the tank body mounting point is quite different to the others.
I went through a spate of broken rear panel plastic mounting tabs so I bought a pair of metal Mato rear panels from Dave at www.forgebeartanks.co.uk he advised against trying to fit it to a Taigen Tiger 1 and it was very difficult but I do now have 2 Taigen Tiger 1s with Mato metal rear panels,
A job not for the faint hearted.
I think I am about to upset someone :haha:
User avatar
Choobox
Recruit
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2019 3:12 am
Location: Shohola, Pennsylvania USA

Re: Mato vs Taigen

Post by Choobox »

Thanks! Good thing I asked. I have a metal Taigen Tiger 1. Love it. It needs a companion. I will stick with the Taigen then.
No one said nuthin ‘bout lock’n horns with no Tigers-
User avatar
Choobox
Recruit
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2019 3:12 am
Location: Shohola, Pennsylvania USA

Re: Mato vs Taigen

Post by Choobox »

I just realized I confused Mato with Torro. Thanks.
No one said nuthin ‘bout lock’n horns with no Tigers-
User avatar
Herr Dr. Professor
Major
Posts: 5476
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 10:48 pm
Location: Southern Wisconsin USA

Re: Mato vs Taigen

Post by Herr Dr. Professor »

You are learning, so a bit of confusion is quite understandable. (Then, too, at my age, a bit of confusion is understandable.) I really like the Taigen/Torro Ready-to-Run tanks. (I tended to buy the more expensive ones so upgrading was unnecessary and so as to avoid having to spend on underwear, socks, dishes--that sort of useless stuff.) I still think the V3 Taigen/Torro with sound modules beat HengLong for WWII tanks, but now HengLong has OK sound for contemporary tanks, and the version 7 HengLong tanks offer much better and flexible control. In the former qualities, HengLong needs to catch up with Taigen/Torro; in the latter, Taigen/Torro needs to catch up with HengLong. Of course, "aftermarket" electronics can be best of all, but at additional expense and with some challenges at installation. If/when you decide to go that step, there are plenty here on RCTW who will help.
User avatar
jarndice
Colonel
Posts: 8392
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:27 am
Location: the mountains of hertfordshire

Re: Mato vs Taigen

Post by jarndice »

As you have seen Choobox Taigen and Torro are the same company mostly selling in different markets and many of their products are interchangeable with Heng Long.
I think I am about to upset someone :haha:
User avatar
Choobox
Recruit
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2019 3:12 am
Location: Shohola, Pennsylvania USA

Re: Mato vs Taigen

Post by Choobox »

Ahhhhhhh. Recruits need superiors to survive. I have been studying the Taigen website. My Tiger has the V3 board and I’m satisfied with it. Probably do the same with the Taigen Sherman kit. Thanks again.
No one said nuthin ‘bout lock’n horns with no Tigers-
User avatar
Jimster
Lieutenant
Posts: 3376
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2018 1:51 am
Location: Illinois

Re: Mato vs Taigen

Post by Jimster »

You’re in good company. I think the majority of RC tankers are certainly satisfied with the factory supplied electronics. I hear they’re getting better.
Having fun is what it’s all about.
User avatar
Herr Dr. Professor
Major
Posts: 5476
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 10:48 pm
Location: Southern Wisconsin USA

Re: Mato vs Taigen

Post by Herr Dr. Professor »

"...Taigen Sherman kit." Ah, so you have the kit to do your own building and painting? If so, I am envious! Do keep us informed!
Post Reply

Return to “General Questions”