Re: Are Tamiya or Torro RC tanks better than Heng Long?
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 10:24 am
This is an endless discussion.
About detail: how much detail do you see when it's 5 meters away? How much detail do you need? You can go endless on that.
Paint: Tamiya models are fairly easy to paint, I tried a repaint job on my HL Challenger now thats a challenge.
Electronics: the older MF and DMD are fairly simple to setup, runs with almost all radios, the newer ones (f.e. Centurion) are very complicated and the sound is just sh*t. The later HL are better than the early ones they do make progress just the sound and soundbox do need improvement.
Building: the Tamiya can be build by any modeller, beginner or advanced and during the proces you can change or add elements to behalf (ballbearings f.e.). With the HL, Taigen etc building is limited to some click on parts and the transfers (better stickers) are sturdy but thick.
Durability: my first Sherman from Tamiya is now 20+ years and still running fine. I have had to change the gearboxes only once and we do drive through different types of sand and dirt very often.
Power efficiency: to my personal experience, the Tamiya Sherman and Pershing (i run most of times) are running longer on a 4600nimh than the Centurion from Haya or the Challenger from HL.
When someone asks me what to do with tanks i always say this: start with a cheap HL. You like tanking go for a more expensive model from HL than Taigen or Mato or.... Eventually there is a fase where you like to build one thats Tamiya.
Many times its just a gut feeling, whether its Tamiya, HL, Taigen, Haya, Coolbank etc.
My 5cents on this topic.
Regards,
Jan
About detail: how much detail do you see when it's 5 meters away? How much detail do you need? You can go endless on that.
Paint: Tamiya models are fairly easy to paint, I tried a repaint job on my HL Challenger now thats a challenge.
Electronics: the older MF and DMD are fairly simple to setup, runs with almost all radios, the newer ones (f.e. Centurion) are very complicated and the sound is just sh*t. The later HL are better than the early ones they do make progress just the sound and soundbox do need improvement.
Building: the Tamiya can be build by any modeller, beginner or advanced and during the proces you can change or add elements to behalf (ballbearings f.e.). With the HL, Taigen etc building is limited to some click on parts and the transfers (better stickers) are sturdy but thick.
Durability: my first Sherman from Tamiya is now 20+ years and still running fine. I have had to change the gearboxes only once and we do drive through different types of sand and dirt very often.
Power efficiency: to my personal experience, the Tamiya Sherman and Pershing (i run most of times) are running longer on a 4600nimh than the Centurion from Haya or the Challenger from HL.
When someone asks me what to do with tanks i always say this: start with a cheap HL. You like tanking go for a more expensive model from HL than Taigen or Mato or.... Eventually there is a fase where you like to build one thats Tamiya.
Many times its just a gut feeling, whether its Tamiya, HL, Taigen, Haya, Coolbank etc.
My 5cents on this topic.
Regards,
Jan