Page 3 of 15
Re: Cheap Tiger 1. Not so Cheap
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2023 8:58 pm
by Meter rat
Free long weekend. The wife is away, on a girls holiday to somewhere or other. Went with the option of changing over the rear decks. Picked up a pad saw and a couple of blades.

- EED7B7AE-B29A-4494-9C27-27ED93890F90.jpeg (114.51 KiB) Viewed 13780 times
Rear deck marked up.

- 531FDB44-7547-4A4A-9396-692076A43E79.jpeg (99.7 KiB) Viewed 13780 times
No going back now.

- 4136547A-5E1F-42E1-A4A6-4722C28F2FF1.jpeg (103.17 KiB) Viewed 13780 times
A looks good and fits. Waiting on the glue to dry overnight then some filler.

- 048ABC9D-BF67-4C3D-A4C2-4C4EBAC6DD5E.jpeg (113.68 KiB) Viewed 13780 times

- 2ADA0C03-D23D-4B36-B95D-7D52CB3563E9.jpeg (115.31 KiB) Viewed 13780 times
Would any know if the Tamiya recoil will work with a Heng Long system?
I’m now waiting for parts, and accessories from different companies.
Regards Ian
Re: Cheap Tiger 1. Not so Cheap
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2023 9:19 pm
by Jimster

Thought I would throw this pic on here just for fun.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Cheap Tiger 1. Not so Cheap
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2023 9:50 pm
by PainlessWolf
Good Afternoon!
Lets keep him Company!
regards,
Painless

- Best shot of Von Norden.jpg (194.58 KiB) Viewed 13774 times
Re: Cheap Tiger 1. Not so Cheap
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2023 11:22 pm
by Jimster
Ha ha! Yup, he needs to get into the spirit of things!
Re: Cheap Tiger 1. Not so Cheap
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2023 6:48 pm
by Meter rat
Managed to get some more work done on this today.
Grafted the front mudguards on, and removed the driver’s vision port.I am waiting on this, along with other parts, to come from Dave at Forgebear.

- 5F98FE01-09E2-4A8C-8C24-CBA5554F6D53.jpeg (98.32 KiB) Viewed 13746 times
Hobby Boss track links fit with Tamiya tracks. This is to replace the broken one that came with the model. The tank came withe plastic tracks and I thought about using the the ones I had made for the static model. As there were a few spare HB links, why not try?

- 73FDED3A-AA96-4CCA-9D6C-046ECF2EED7E.jpeg (135.09 KiB) Viewed 13746 times
The repair parts for the rear idler are with Royal Mail. By next week I may have a working chassis.
Gun barrel has been made to fit.

- D8751628-7AB4-4E12-909C-72B61877EEA2.jpeg (107.82 KiB) Viewed 13746 times
This looks better, although I had to repair it, as the end had been broken off at some point and been repaired with some tube externally. It now has some aluminium tube inside. It need some filler and cleaning up.

- 2F8CE53D-59D8-4AC6-A5CA-16A94FEB54AD.jpeg (59.24 KiB) Viewed 13746 times
I think this Tiger is going to be either 331, or 332 of 7PzDiv, 3 Company, Heavy Pz Abt 503, commanded by Richard Freiherr Von Rosen. Photos in his book Panzer Ace show that this is close to what mine looks like.

- E8458011-2BBB-4AA9-83CC-26E7D85E604A.jpeg (115.22 KiB) Viewed 13746 times
Then I got distracted. It’s hard to concentrate when this passes the bottom of the garden.

- DBCBAA57-B7CF-4662-B35A-88290785F04E.jpeg (103.7 KiB) Viewed 13743 times
Regards Ian
Re: Cheap Tiger 1. Not so Cheap
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2023 12:00 am
by Panzermechaniker
What was the issue with the original top hull piece that made you use the Hobby Boss to replace it? I agree it's a weak part of the Tamiya kit and gets worse and worse fitting as you beat the hell out of it over the years plus always removing to charge the battery packs but I would have thought you could have got it to sit properly again with some magnets and a little bit of reinforcement. Mine has been run very hard at the field and is at that point where I am going that route to keep it in place. It's a very robust kit otherwise
Re: Cheap Tiger 1. Not so Cheap
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2023 12:57 pm
by Meter rat
Panzermechaniker wrote: ↑Mon Jul 17, 2023 12:00 am
What was the issue with the original top hull piece that made you use the Hobby Boss to replace it? I agree it's a weak part of the Tamiya kit and gets worse and worse fitting as you beat the hell out of it over the years plus always removing to charge the battery packs but I would have thought you could have got it to sit properly again with some magnets and a little bit of reinforcement. Mine has been run very hard at the field and is at that point where I am going that route to keep it in place. It's a very robust kit otherwise
The rationale for this was to give a a budget friendly WW2 tank. The HB model was bought by my wife as a Christmas present about 4 or 5 years ago. As I am not really into WW2 models it was put away. Not wanting to tell the wife I was not really interested. She is small and very scary. I had thought about motorising it, using Heng Long parts, so had built the chassis and got no further. She then came home from a car boot sale with the Tamiya, because it is a tank and, “I like them”. This too was put into the loft. Life got in the way while we built a 1:1 house. The Tamiya really is in poor condition, with missing, damaged, and poor repairs. The photographs make it look far better than it is. To repair it was cost prohibitive to buy the sprues. But it gave good chassis, without have to mix and match parts into the HB chassis, with no guarantee of success, and at, again expense. Combining the two may give me a chance to get a working model, develop new skills, and have fun. I already have a Heng Long TX and receiver, smoker, and speaker. I will never battle any of my models. And is a cheaper way than buying a Heng Long Tiger and detailing it. Sorry for the long winded reply. I could have just said “Because I can”
Re: Cheap Tiger 1. Not so Cheap
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2023 12:06 am
by Panzermechaniker
Ich verstehe jetzt

Going to be reinforcing my Tamiya hull so was just wondering if you had seen something bad I was missing on the donor tank
Re: Cheap Tiger 1. Not so Cheap
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2023 11:14 am
by Meter rat
Icy bin froh, dass meine erklarung sinn ergibt.
Re: Cheap Tiger 1. Not so Cheap
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:29 pm
by Meter rat