A Question About Rank

If you have a tank query and you can't find the answer anywhere else, post here. (TIP - Check for answers in FAQ, use the 'search' facility or even check this board before posting here).
Forum rules
If your question is electronics related please post it in one of the relevant boards here: viewforum.php?f=31
User avatar
Max-U52
Lieutenant
Posts: 3879
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 8:56 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: A Question About Rank

Post by Max-U52 »

Wow, Shaun, they sure make it complicated. The US system seems a little easier, and rank for enlisted men goes from E-1 to E-9, the bottom three being privates, then E-4 is Corporal, E-5 Buck Sergeant, E-6 Staff Sergeant, E-7 Sergeant First Class, both Master Sergeant and First Sergeant are E-8 and both Sergeant Major and Command Sergeant Major are E-9. Then you have Sergeant Major of the Army, but he doesn't have an E number. Then there are O numbers for Officers but I don't know nuttin' bout dat. Like I said, I work for a living!! Hmmm, maybe it's not really any easier after all.
When FDR coined the phrase "The Arsenal of Democracy", he was talking about Detroit. Proud to live in the 2nd most violent city in America!!
ALPHA
Major-General
Posts: 10960
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:06 am

Re: A Question About Rank

Post by ALPHA »

Max-U52 wrote:Wow, Shaun, they sure make it complicated. The US system seems a little easier, and rank for enlisted men goes from E-1 to E-9, the bottom three being privates, then E-4 is Corporal, E-5 Buck Sergeant, E-6 Staff Sergeant, E-7 Sergeant First Class, both Master Sergeant and First Sergeant are E-8 and both Sergeant Major and Command Sergeant Major are E-9. Then you have Sergeant Major of the Army, but he doesn't have an E number. Then there are O numbers for Officers but I don't know nuttin' bout dat. Like I said, I work for a living!! Hmmm, maybe it's not really any easier after all.
Nothing said Explains the highest rank of FIELD MARSHAL :wtf: ...I'm not German...so to me it's a glorified yard man ...or Referee :haha: :haha:


ALPHA
User avatar
Markocaster
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 997
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:16 pm
Location: Bay Area , California

Re: A Question About Rank

Post by Markocaster »

ALPHA wrote:
Markocaster wrote:I am here daily reading along and learning (is that lurking ? :haha: I don't post a ton as I am usually on my phone and hate typing with the old thumbs! I REALLY like this board. RC universe is cool and lots of good info. But I really prefer it here:)
I should have been more clear on the term Lurkers.....there are Lurkers ....those who have a sense of humor and adventure...and there are LURKERS...who are pretty much more like trolls :haha: :haha: :haha:


ALPHA
:haha: :haha: :haha:
HL /Mato tiger 1 early, Tamiya Tiger 1 early, Taigen tiger 1 mid
Taigen T34/85, HL SU-100
Jagdpanzer Lang
Taiga Jagdpanther
Heng Long Sherman DGS Firefly kit
Tamiya King Tiger (unbuilt)
Mato all metal Panzer III
1/10 Jagdpanther
User avatar
Ecam
Warrant Officer 1st Class
Posts: 2206
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 6:30 pm
Location: Lake of the Ozarks, USA

Re: A Question About Rank

Post by Ecam »

I would argue.....

Rommel was probably the great leader in the tank lore....

I can see it as the leading rank on the forum.
"Don't believe everything you see on the internet" - George S. Patton

Eric
User avatar
jarndice
Colonel
Posts: 8403
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:27 am
Location: the mountains of hertfordshire

Re: A Question About Rank

Post by jarndice »

I just love adding to the confusion,
After the last unpleasentness the British Army was reduced in size, and the appointment of Field Marshal would if continued have an extraordinarily top heavy effect on the command structure,
The military rank of Field Marshal is a rare appointment, now usually granted upon retirement of the most senior officer's although there are two serving Field Marshals.
Gary how I laughed at your roll call of United States Army ranks, AND YOU THINK BRITISH ARMY RANKS ARE CONFUSING, Trust me to an outsider looking in, your military appointments are on a par with anything we can come up with, and we have been doing this since Oliver Cromwell's New Model Army of the 17th Century. :haha:
Shaun.
Last edited by jarndice on Sat Feb 20, 2016 8:22 pm, edited 2 times in total.
I think I am about to upset someone :haha:
ALPHA
Major-General
Posts: 10960
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:06 am

Re: A Question About Rank

Post by ALPHA »

Ecam wrote:I would argue.....

Rommel was probably the great leader in the tank lore....

I can see it as the leading rank on the forum.
I see your point Ecam....Back in the Day Rommel was the Soldier's Soldier...and was an outstanding tactician...So cunning he was able to outfox his desert opponents....................HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM..... :think: DESERT FOX............ :think: ....Never mind...I think I could live with the association now :haha: :haha:


ALPHA
User avatar
jarndice
Colonel
Posts: 8403
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:27 am
Location: the mountains of hertfordshire

Re: A Question About Rank

Post by jarndice »

I smile when people say how Field Marshall Rommel was one of the few German senior officers with clean hands,
Prior to the start of WW 2 Herr Rommel was the commanding officer of Mr Hitler's bodyguard and for many years in so far as Mr Hitler had any, one of his closest friends,
Which does not detract in any way from his brilliant tactical use of armour as evidenced in his speedy conquest of Belgium and northern France in 1940 when his use of a vastly inferior armoured force never the less ran rings around the mainly Professional soldiers of the British armoured divisions as well as destroying the French Char B which outgunned all but Colonel Rommel's Czech built 38Ts.
Whatever taint there may be because of his association with Mr Hitler he was truly a soldiers soldier, and certainly by the time of his passing a man of Honour.
Shaun.
I think I am about to upset someone :haha:
billpe
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 1144
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 1:59 pm
Location: The bowels of Kent

Re: A Question About Rank

Post by billpe »

Manstein was far more proficient than Rommel in armoured warfare. So much so that NATO based thier cold war strategy against the Warsaw Pact on his theories. Even today he is mandatory reading.
User avatar
ausf
Lance Corporal
Posts: 245
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 1:30 am
Location: New York

Re: A Question About Rank

Post by ausf »

I'd make the argument for Guderian over both of them in terms of armor usage in the opening days of the War.
What, me worry?
User avatar
jarndice
Colonel
Posts: 8403
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:27 am
Location: the mountains of hertfordshire

Re: A Question About Rank

Post by jarndice »

BILL I agree with you whole heartedly about Manstein,
But I would make a couple of points, Rommel was THE German tactician in the West and in the Western desert for the FIRST TWO YEARS of the war,
Manstein was fighting an initially ill prepared and poorly equipped adversary which soon became well equipped with the T34 and troop training in the Soviet armed forces also rapidly improved helped by a once in a blue moon truly vicious Winter so even with Guderian's insight into armoured warfare the sheer mass of Soviet forces meant any advances by the German armed forces were not to last, and so the German Army under Manstein in the East became the most able Army anywhere in Rearguard actions. And as you say those lessons were intergrated into NATO policy post War.
Shaun.
I think I am about to upset someone :haha:
Post Reply

Return to “General Questions”