WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS

Feel free to discuss anything and everything to do with tanking here!
Post Reply
Militarymight
Corporal
Posts: 409
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 3:22 pm
Location: Kinver
Contact:

WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS

Post by Militarymight »

Now with the micro chip and ever evolving technology what could this mean for rc tanking and rc toys in general, what may be the next big step in there evolution.
MilitaryMightUK
Suppliers of 1 16 armour and accessories
User avatar
oz
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 1051
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:47 am
Location: UK

Re: WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS

Post by oz »

how about a micro transmitter in your head so you can control you RC tanks by thought waves.  :o
DOG
Lance Corporal
Posts: 210
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:58 pm
Location: GOSPORT HAMPSHIRE

Re: WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS

Post by DOG »

How about a radio control wife
HL PANZER III & IV WSN T34 TAMIYA SHERMAN,TIGER I, KING TIGER,PANTHER G.
User avatar
Matdragon
2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 2994
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 9:58 pm
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS

Post by Matdragon »

hehehe i would the chip in the head thing ;D

one day im going to make a two person controlled tank, 2 transmitters for onw tank but one persomn controlls the turret functions and the other the driving functions and machine gun, all i would nee to do it split the transmitter, and then i would put a mini camera in the turret and drivers hatch!

cheers, not exactly the future but it would be more real.

cheers,

Matt
Militarymight
Corporal
Posts: 409
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 3:22 pm
Location: Kinver
Contact:

Re: WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS

Post by Militarymight »

DOG wrote: How about a radio control wife
never work mate you will never be able to find the OFF button believe me already tried
MilitaryMightUK
Suppliers of 1 16 armour and accessories
User avatar
tiger205
Warrant Officer 1st Class
Posts: 1800
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 11:21 pm
Location: southampton

Re: WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS

Post by tiger205 »

oz, what ever your on, i want some ;D ;D ;D, . i think a remote control wife would be more dangerous than facing a firing squad, what if the transmiter went tits up like the hl ones do sometimes!!! that dont bear thinking about :-[

            Tony 8)
Image

"Er, der kämpft und Lebend davonläuft,
Lebt um einem anderen Tag zu kämpfen".
User avatar
oz
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 1051
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:47 am
Location: UK

Re: WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS

Post by oz »

DOG wrote: How about a radio control wife
have you ever seen the stepford wives. :'(
971wright
2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 2733
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:16 pm
Location: nelson Lancashire

Re: WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS

Post by 971wright »

More frighting than that what if you couldnt find remote and you needed to hit mute button.


              regards pete
User avatar
wibblywobbly
Major
Posts: 6396
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 9:30 am
Location: South Wales Valley
Contact:

Re: WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS

Post by wibblywobbly »

I have already toyed with this.

Get one of those mini spycams and mount it where the tank commander goes. Use a handheld battery powered screen.

You then get a commanders eye view of the tank and surroundings from the turret just like the real thing. If I could get my usual tanking partner to invest the kit, then we could put the tanks on the battlefield, screen off our direct view of them, and have a very realistic tank battle in which neither of us could see anything other than what the tank commander could see. If I was feeling really clever I would put the camera on a pole connected to a servo (I have a 7 channel tx) so that I could rotate the tank, the turret and the commander independently.

Rob G
Tiger 1 Late
Panther G
King Tiger
M36 B1
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”