If you have a tank query and you can't find the answer anywhere else, post here. (TIP - Check for answers in FAQ, use the 'search' facility or even check this board before posting here).
Forum rules
If your question is electronics related please post it in one of the relevant boards here: viewforum.php?f=31
I’ve actually been “researching” this topic for my Tiger. I’m no expert but I know the look I’m going for. I have three different manufacturers metal tracks to compare and here’s my opinion. I think the Mato are closer in appearance because of the finer looking detail. The Taigen tracks are a bit large looking to my eyes especially when comparing to photos of original tanks. The viewing angle can change appearances so I looked at tons of photos! On the Mato tracks the little parts that stick out the sides are a bit too small but think for general appearance Mato looks more authentic. Although the Mato horns don’t have the hole in them like Taigen. Heng Long isn’t bad but Mato wins in my book. I’m still waiting for my Mato sprockets to arrive then I’ll post pics of my new weathered tracks
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by Jimster on Sat Jul 04, 2020 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I confirm they are not compatible. Both require own brand sprockets to run right. The idler can be shared though so can be road wheels to some extent. Mato sprockets are not compatible with Taigen gearbox shafts. I like Mato sprockets for the screw cap. The rest comes in better quality from Taigen.
Mato road wheels without bearings are terrible. Mato idlers with the hole are unusable on anything but Mato tensioner. I dislike the hole too. And the bearing inside is no consolation.
Mato gearbox is pretty good actually.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Started as a tank man.
2x early Tiger 1's made from parts of HL, Taigen, Mato and whatever I saw suitable.
Ural 4320 (~1/12)
WPL B36 Ural