New and clueless

New to the forum? Introduce yourself here.
User avatar
silversurfer1947
Lieutenant
Posts: 3337
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 9:54 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: New and clueless

Post by silversurfer1947 »

Could I just point out that in his first post the OP said he wanted to build a tank, not but a complete tank rtr.
Richard
Tamiya Tiger 1, Taigen FlakPanzer IV,Torro M16 half-track, Tamiya Panther,WSN/Torro T34,Taigen M41 Bulldog,H/l/Taigen Sherman M4A3,H/L T90, Haya M3 Grant, Metal Origins 234/2 Puma, Nashorn by Alwyn. I was only going to have one tank - honest! :D
User avatar
Rad_Schuhart
Warrant Officer 1st Class
Posts: 2089
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 9:22 am
Location: Spanish living in Graz, Austria. Heart in UK.
Contact:

Re: New and clueless

Post by Rad_Schuhart »

silversurfer1947 wrote:Could I just point out that in his first post the OP said he wanted to build a tank, not but a complete tank rtr.
Well, if our new friend wants to build it, and wants it to be radio controlled, Tamiya is the way to go, unless he is able to scratchbuild one, of course.

Answering your previous post, I loved to assemble the kits, but in honor to the truth is a job that can be done in a weekend and the parts count is very low (of course not counting the bolts and screws), with massive parts, but everything fits like a dream and nothing needs to be drilled, sanded and so on.

But what I pointed on my previous message is not just my experience. Just make an experiment and go to google and write "Tamiya king tiger idler" and see how many people has problems with it, and how many aftermarket parts are for trying to fix that horrible flawed design.
Google the rest of my list and you will find more, except for the damaged transmisions that just stopped working and people does not even know why. Here is why:
http://www.customrcmodels.com/files/RCP ... PGRADE.pdf

That text is not written by me, but by the famous Daryl Turner who is repairing tanks and IR battling for more than 20 years.
Check also how many people are looking for another set of gears for the rotation units.
Just take a look at the plastic tracks with open pins in most of the kits. (Tamiya sherman tracks are great, but not the panzer iv, tiger, tiger 2, kv1) Even the cheapo WSN tracks are better!

I have been given another tamiya king tiger by a friend, believe or not he found it on the bin. He loves RC stuff, but after seing the problems it has, he just gave it to me. He also pointed all of what I stated above. (I will post pics once repainted, now is horrible, lol)

I dont want to discourage our new friend, I am just saying there is no such a reliabilty and quality in the tamiya tanks. At least not according with those prices. Have you considered with the price of one of those tanks you can buy a 1/1 scale moped and you can drive around the world with it? Lol
My RC tanks website, loads of free info for everybody:
https://radindustries.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Jimster
Lieutenant
Posts: 3374
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2018 1:51 am
Location: Illinois

Re: New and clueless

Post by Jimster »

Another aspect of decision making is what you plan to do with your tank. Some folks want to participate in IR tank battles and others, like myself, just enjoy driving on backyard “maneuvers” and try to drive it realistically at slow speeds with awesome sound effects. However I knew none of this at first so I bought a Heng Long Tiger 1 and never looked back. This hobby is certainly immersive :D
Tiger6
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 1460
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 10:38 pm

Re: New and clueless

Post by Tiger6 »

You do realise that holding up Willy and Daryl's work as examples of how Tamiya is somehow bad, is like pointing to an F1 driver thrashing an ordinary family car to the point of destruction as some kind of proof that the car must be junk, right?

All tanks on the market have their issues. The guy doing the shopping needs to decide which of those issues he wants to live with, and which he wants to avoid.
Making sweeping generalisations, and selecting random examples without context, don't help anyone make an informed choice.
User avatar
Rad_Schuhart
Warrant Officer 1st Class
Posts: 2089
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 9:22 am
Location: Spanish living in Graz, Austria. Heart in UK.
Contact:

Re: New and clueless

Post by Rad_Schuhart »

Tiger6 wrote:
You do realise that holding up Willy and Daryl's work as examples of how Tamiya is somehow bad, is like pointing to an F1 driver thrashing an ordinary family car to the point of destruction as some kind of proof that the car must be junk, right?
That might be right, yep... But I drive my tanks like an old half-blind grandma and I had a gearbox failure. When I talked with him he told me to take them away and to take a look at that part. I did it and those sprockets were worn on that place, so it proofed he was right.

The rest of things I wrote in that list and in my website is my personal experience that I can document with pictures... And sadly with my paypal account buying spares and parts here and there. Not what I expect when I paid such a big money for one of those super high quality kits. Makes me cry.

I
My RC tanks website, loads of free info for everybody:
https://radindustries.wordpress.com/
Tiger6
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 1460
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 10:38 pm

Re: New and clueless

Post by Tiger6 »

[quote="Rad_Schuhart" in my website is my personal experience that I can document with pictures... [/quote]

And on there you also detail pouring money into a Heng Long Panzer III, until you gave up on it :wave:

ALL tanks have their issues.

You can start with an expensive tank and it will break.

You can start with a cheap tank, decide that it ain't quite good enough for what you want, pour money into it to the point that it rivals the cost of the expensive tank, and it will still break.

ALL tanks have their issues.

Perhaps the best advice I can offer the OP (assuming he is still reading this nonsense 8O ) is to decide on a budget, then decide on what features he wants, and then ask questions on how to mesh the 2 requirements. There is no fixed right or wrong answer that we can give.
User avatar
Rad_Schuhart
Warrant Officer 1st Class
Posts: 2089
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 9:22 am
Location: Spanish living in Graz, Austria. Heart in UK.
Contact:

Re: New and clueless

Post by Rad_Schuhart »

What I wrote about my Panzer III was after years of abuse and literally hundreds of kilometers, including my oldest son sinking it in the sea, my daughter sinking it in a pond, my smallest playing with it in the long grass and tons of abuse over grass, mud and sand in the beach. Ill try to post a pic later.

Meanwhile my sherman broke on the first run at the backyard. All return rollers half mooned in minutes and more.

I am not defending my Panzer III or heng long but it lasted way, way more than all my tamiya tanks. Meanwhile my tamiyas run between cottons and fail

EDIT: Two pics attached.
IMG_20150729_182149490.jpg
IMG_20150729_182423982_HDR.jpg
Those are old pics, my son, who was 4, was driving it over mud and I took the pics. That was some of the use and abuse of that Panzer and it lasted quite good for years. It could last longer with bearings in the wheels, but anyway, it was a 60 euros free shipping tank. With tamiya I am reluctant to drive it outside home.
My RC tanks website, loads of free info for everybody:
https://radindustries.wordpress.com/
User avatar
43rdRecceReg
Major
Posts: 6295
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2015 11:38 am
Location: North West Highlands, Scotland

Re: New and clueless

Post by 43rdRecceReg »

I've built five Tamiya tanks. No other manufacturer comes close in terms of precision parts, and accurate fitment. Their suspension systems are simply the best. :thumbup:
That said, it's possible to grouse about inflated prices; strength sacrificed for detail (on occasion- e.g. the Tiger 1's overly bendy hull roof); and dated electronics (one of the larger worms in Rad's prodigious Tamiya can :lolno: ). All in all, though, I'd maintain that every serious collection of Rc armour would be incomplete without at least one example. Tamiya get so much right- especially on the Pz IV (my favourite). :thumbup:
"Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please"- Mark Twain.
User avatar
PershingLover
Corporal
Posts: 309
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2019 11:37 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: New and clueless

Post by PershingLover »

Wow, this is actually pretty heated..

Rad, how do you drive in mud like the first pic without water getting in?
User avatar
X82d Pathfinder
Corporal
Posts: 364
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 3:43 am
Location: Colleyville, TX.

Re: New and clueless

Post by X82d Pathfinder »

Tamiya is hands down probably the best operating as far as reliability and without a doubt the most full-proof. The engineering is also unmatched.
I have a couple of builds that are Tamiya/Heng Long and bastardized.
Yes, the outlay more initially, but you'll be glad you did. As you become more accomplished and understand the operation you could try a Heng Long.
The Heng Long electronics and mechanical operation will always have you fixing something.
A Commander has to make vital decision on incomplete information in a matter of seconds, and afterwards the experts can sit down at leisure, with all the facts before them, and argue about what he might, could or should have done.- Sir William Slim
Post Reply

Return to “Introduce Yourself”