Heng long improvements

Feel free to discuss anything and everything to do with tanking here!
percy1510
Corporal
Posts: 363
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:22 pm
Location: Stoke on Trent

Heng long improvements

Post by percy1510 »

Just a bit of fun. I have recently got a v6 heng long tiger. Obviously it’s a massive improvement over the earlier models with the old 27mhz radios. They have got rid of the horrible track recoil and the slow speed driving is loads better, plus of course choice of sounds. My question is what would be your wish list for things for heng long to improve on with future models. For me it would have to be the horrible headlights with the bulb sticking out at the front.....
User avatar
jarndice
Colonel
Posts: 8396
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:27 am
Location: the mountains of hertfordshire

Re: Heng long improvements

Post by jarndice »

Remove the second aerial stowage tube and fix the turret mislocation on the Tiger 1,
Allow a 4/5 degree slope on the engine bay of the Panzer 4 and please sort out the abortion that is laughingly called a suspension.
Make metal hulls available across the range of Tanks.
Get rid of those terrible decals and provide relevant water slide alternatives.
That's for starters.
I think I am about to upset someone :haha:
User avatar
General Jumbo01
Warrant Officer 1st Class
Posts: 1780
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2018 8:06 pm
Location: I'm a Londoner that moved to Essex. Says it all really...:(

Re: Heng long improvements

Post by General Jumbo01 »

And fit quality motors/gearboxes, hobby standard radio separate from the mfu, increase the range of models / variations. But apart from all of the above..... They are okay :) l suppose..
Black Knight
Lance Corporal
Posts: 242
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 12:58 am
Location: Sittingbourne Kent

Re: Heng long improvements

Post by Black Knight »

percy1510 wrote: the horrible headlights with the bulb sticking out at the front.....
Nothing that can't be sorted with a file/dremmel :clap: :D
Always on the search for Bootneck-proof kit
User avatar
Son of a gun-ner
Lieutenant-Colonel
Posts: 7533
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 8:49 pm
Location: Lancashire UK

Re: Heng long improvements

Post by Son of a gun-ner »

percy1510, you're aiming too low, jarndice and General Jumbo01 have basically summed up the necessary stuff needed. Although, Taigen now cover most of their wishes, apart from not improving the top hulls and staying backwards with moulded tools.
Mick - The grit in the underpants of life!
Always happy to spare the bytes
Apparently my mind works in mysterious ways :think:

TOTM needs YOU :thumbup: support YOUR TOTM competition, I'm doing my part, are YOU?
percy1510
Corporal
Posts: 363
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:22 pm
Location: Stoke on Trent

Re: Heng long improvements

Post by percy1510 »

Oh yes moulded on tools are terrible. I suppose that’s one area where heng long are good. Would definately be great to see a bigger range of models. A Cromwell would be amazing
User avatar
43rdRecceReg
Major
Posts: 6295
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2015 11:38 am
Location: North West Highlands, Scotland

Re: Heng long improvements

Post by 43rdRecceReg »

Given that this is something of a niche market, I guess we have to be grateful for small mercies. :|
Still, If Tamiya can get the Tiger 1 and Panzer 4 details to pass muster, why can't Heng Long, or Taigen, for that matter? If it's worth doing at all, then it must be worth doing right. Given the (alleged) Chinese passion for acquiring intellectual property by less than honest means, you'd think they'd just counterfeit Tamiya's moulds and injection processes.
Wish list-wise, one improvement would be to produce some British tanks. They made a pretty good job of the Chally 2 (Tamiya didn't even bother), but a Centurion would be- surely- a world-beater :thumbup:
"Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please"- Mark Twain.
Black Knight
Lance Corporal
Posts: 242
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 12:58 am
Location: Sittingbourne Kent

Re: Heng long improvements

Post by Black Knight »

43rdRecceReg wrote: one improvement would be to produce some British tanks. They made a pretty good job of the Chally 2 (Tamiya didn't even bother), but a Centurion would be- surely- a world-beater :thumbup:
Don't forget Cromwell, Churchill, Comet, Chieftan and Challenger (1?) - I'd buy them all :D
Always on the search for Bootneck-proof kit
User avatar
Son of a gun-ner
Lieutenant-Colonel
Posts: 7533
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 8:49 pm
Location: Lancashire UK

Re: Heng long improvements

Post by Son of a gun-ner »

Black Knight wrote:
43rdRecceReg wrote: one improvement would be to produce some British tanks. They made a pretty good job of the Chally 2 (Tamiya didn't even bother), but a Centurion would be- surely- a world-beater :thumbup:
Don't forget Cromwell, Churchill, Comet, Chieftan and Challenger (1?) - I'd buy them all :D
So would I, and many British enthusiasts too, but would the rest of the world? Sadly what they produce has to appeal to the world market to max sales.
Mick - The grit in the underpants of life!
Always happy to spare the bytes
Apparently my mind works in mysterious ways :think:

TOTM needs YOU :thumbup: support YOUR TOTM competition, I'm doing my part, are YOU?
User avatar
jarndice
Colonel
Posts: 8396
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:27 am
Location: the mountains of hertfordshire

Re: Heng long improvements

Post by jarndice »

And once more the Vickers Conqueror is consigned to the specialist pages of a very few books of reference.
Shame on you so called enthusiasts :haha: :haha:
I think I am about to upset someone :haha:
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”