Hi gang
Thoughts please. Just finishing off a T34 and have reached the point where I'd normally start loading up with stowage. However on trawling through Google images all the T34,s seem devoid of clutter. Any ideas why? The best I've found is a few rolled up tarps. There's no bags no ammo boxes or any of the normal crap you see on other tanks. I've seen inside a T34 and it's not exactly roomy, what's the deal?
T34 stowage
- HERMAN BIX
- Major-General
- Posts: 11434
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:15 am
- Location: Gold Coast,Australia
Re: T34 stowage
Im assuming that the high turn over of tanks and crew meant that there simply was not the longevity of either to display that lived in look.
Far from being a long service machine, the later T34/85 vehicles were destroyed or broke down before to long.
Various accounts elude to the '85 being destroyed before needing an oil change..............
The usual ammo ignition that see pictures of completely shattered Soviet tanks- despite being diesel not petrol, is another indicator................the new tank with its new crew would stow its own gear for the brief time they existed.
Look at the loss ratio figures for T series machines...........mind blowing losses.
Plus, the more gear stowed on the outside of the tank= the less room for infantry to catch a ride in support of the armoured attack..........I know what I would prefer.
Either that or the Soviet looting system meant they just picked up what they needed from the opulent German living standard as they went.................
Far from being a long service machine, the later T34/85 vehicles were destroyed or broke down before to long.
Various accounts elude to the '85 being destroyed before needing an oil change..............
The usual ammo ignition that see pictures of completely shattered Soviet tanks- despite being diesel not petrol, is another indicator................the new tank with its new crew would stow its own gear for the brief time they existed.
Look at the loss ratio figures for T series machines...........mind blowing losses.
Plus, the more gear stowed on the outside of the tank= the less room for infantry to catch a ride in support of the armoured attack..........I know what I would prefer.
Either that or the Soviet looting system meant they just picked up what they needed from the opulent German living standard as they went.................
HL JAGDPANTHER,HL TIGER 1,HL PzIII MUNITIONSCHLEPPER, HL KT OCTOPUS,HL PANTHER ZU-FUSS,HL STuG III,HL T34/85 BEDSPRING,
HL PZIV MALTA,MATORRO JAGDTIGER,HL F05 TIGER,TAMIYA KT,HL PANTHERDOZER,HL EARLY PANTHER G,TAIGEN/RAMINATOR T34/76,
HL AN-BRI-RAM SU-85
HL PZIV MALTA,MATORRO JAGDTIGER,HL F05 TIGER,TAMIYA KT,HL PANTHERDOZER,HL EARLY PANTHER G,TAIGEN/RAMINATOR T34/76,
HL AN-BRI-RAM SU-85
- c.rainford73
- Major
- Posts: 6104
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 7:34 pm
- Location: Connecticut USA
Re: T34 stowage
Here are some photos of my T-34 85 it's obviously not a standard Russian version but maybe you can use these pictures for an idea. I realize that the Germans did utilize more add on stowage and applique armor like plates and added tracks.
I have many painted track spares heavily weathered if interested.







Have fun- Carl
I have many painted track spares heavily weathered if interested.







Have fun- Carl
Tanks alot....

- Afrikakorps
- Corporal
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 1:40 am
- Location: Australia
Re: T34 stowage
Hi Rocketman,
I think that Herman is on the mark with his answer.
Pictures of T34's with lots of stowage are not common. I have examples with logs, buckets, boxes, tarps etc. but few with everything.
Here are a few examples that may help you.
Cheers
AK
I think that Herman is on the mark with his answer.

Pictures of T34's with lots of stowage are not common. I have examples with logs, buckets, boxes, tarps etc. but few with everything.
Here are a few examples that may help you.
Cheers
AK
- Attachments
-
- t3485belgrad36gtb.jpg (80.21 KiB) Viewed 832 times
-
- 9c41c69def98a344a622b06f430c3dfe.jpg (51.69 KiB) Viewed 832 times
Panzer III G
Sherman M4A3 (105)
T-34/76 (1942)
Panzer IV Wirbelwind
Sturmtiger
KV-2
M26 Pershing
T-34/76 (1943)
KV-1
M3 Lee
Ferdinand / Elephant
M16 Half-track
Panther G
M4a1 (75mm)
M41 Walker Bulldog
JS-2
M4a3e8 (76mm)
Japanese Type94
FT-17
Tiger 1
Sherman M4A3 (105)
T-34/76 (1942)
Panzer IV Wirbelwind
Sturmtiger
KV-2
M26 Pershing
T-34/76 (1943)
KV-1
M3 Lee
Ferdinand / Elephant
M16 Half-track
Panther G
M4a1 (75mm)
M41 Walker Bulldog
JS-2
M4a3e8 (76mm)
Japanese Type94
FT-17
Tiger 1
- Raminator
- Warrant Officer 2nd Class
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2015 9:57 am
- Location: Newcastle, Australia
Re: T34 stowage
Nice collection of photos, Afrikakorps. Looks like the stowage centres around reliability and range: fuel tanks, track links, ropes/chains/cables.
The comfort of the desantniki comes before the comfort of the crew, it's one of those "happy wife, happy life" type deals.HERMAN BIX wrote:Plus, the more gear stowed on the outside of the tank= the less room for infantry to catch a ride in support of the armoured attack..........I know what I would prefer.
Re: T34 stowage
Oooo, love those pictures. Thanks so much! im just looking at the pic with the massive oil drum balanced on the back, i played with thet idea and rejected it as it looked so unrealsitic. just goes to show how life can be stanger than fiction.....
K
K