M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

If you have a tank query and you can't find the answer anywhere else, post here. (TIP - Check for answers in FAQ, use the 'search' facility or even check this board before posting here).
Forum rules
If your question is electronics related please post it in one of the relevant boards here: viewforum.php?f=31
tao
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 795
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:08 am

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Post by tao »

Thanks for the input! Really sounds like a great tank..visually and mechanically!
tao
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 795
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:08 am

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Post by tao »

How do you think the 90 mm gun stacked up..about on par with 88 KwK L56 but less than KwK 43 L71 in Tiger II?
tao
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 795
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:08 am

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Post by tao »

How do you think the 90 mm gun stacked up..about on par with 88 KwK L56 but less than KwK 43 L71 in Tiger II?
User avatar
tomhugill
Captain
Posts: 4885
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:21 am

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Post by tomhugill »

From what I've read I would say so
User avatar
Dr Phibes
Corporal
Posts: 300
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 9:38 pm
Location: Southampton, England, UK

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Post by Dr Phibes »

Ah, I stand corrected - no doubt I confused with some other tank or statistic. Crikey only 187 eh, that's doesn't seem a lot at all.
tao
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 795
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:08 am

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Post by tao »

Do you think the stock paint color is good and just weather it or would you suggest bare metal and start from there?
User avatar
Dr Phibes
Corporal
Posts: 300
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 9:38 pm
Location: Southampton, England, UK

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Post by Dr Phibes »

tao wrote:Do you think the stock paint color is good and just weather it or would you suggest bare metal and start from there?
Personally I am glad I opted for the bare metal version. Not much is saved by getting the painted version, apart from the time and cost of the painting itself of course. However, even though this tank comes with some very good, and sometime quite excellent, detail and features there are still a number of areas that, for me, need attention/modding, depending on how far you want to go naturally.

As already mentioned it appears the barrel lock needs to be moved to the correct position on the rear. Moreover, I have found quite a few (small) areas of rough casting, and quite a bit of flashing on suspension units needs removing and generally cleaning up. I also found small but visible gaps between the lower turret and the upper section which are screwed together. The gaps needs filling here, as well as a few other places, and there are also missing weld lines here and there.
I also have in mind a number of further detailing mods so, for me, it is just as well I got the bare metal version as a lot of re-painting would have been in order anyway. On the other hand you may just prefer a ready out of the box painted finish and there is nothing wrong with that.
tao
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 795
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:08 am

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Post by tao »

I see two positions for the gun lock?
Attachments
M36rearright.jpg
M36rearright.jpg (54.48 KiB) Viewed 1577 times
M36_Jackson_04.jpg
User avatar
tomhugill
Captain
Posts: 4885
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:21 am

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Post by tomhugill »

tao wrote:I see two positions for the gun lock?
Top pictures the m36b2 which is on the m10 hull. Second pictures where it needs to go.
tao
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 795
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:08 am

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Post by tao »

Thanks Tom!
Post Reply

Return to “General Questions”