Effect of British 17-Pounder on Tiger Armour

Feel free to discuss anything and everything to do with tanking here!
User avatar
43rdRecceReg
Major
Posts: 6295
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2015 11:38 am
Location: North West Highlands, Scotland

Effect of British 17-Pounder on Tiger Armour

Post by 43rdRecceReg »

Found this interesting pic of the state of Tiger armour after an encounter with a British 17-Pounder. Maybe it was from a Firefly mounted one...who knows? Anyway, although this round didn't penetrate completely, the heat and the shockwave possibly maimed the crew, or gave them the world's biggest headache... :O
Arrgh..das tut Mir sehr weh..
Arrgh..das tut Mir sehr weh..
Tiger armour after being hit by British 17-Pounder.jpg (52.76 KiB) Viewed 2736 times

and the Germans liked the Firefly so much, they bought one:
Attachments
Heinrich having trouble with a three-point turn
Heinrich having trouble with a three-point turn
German Firefly.jpg (39.34 KiB) Viewed 2736 times
"Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please"- Mark Twain.
RobW
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 1218
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 2:55 pm
Location: Sheffield

Re: Effect of British 17-Pounder on Tiger Armour

Post by RobW »

Interesting. I suspect the shrapnel from the damaged Tiger armour would have been fatal if it's in the occupied space. Was it from the field or a test firing on a range?
User avatar
jackalope
Lieutenant
Posts: 3882
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 7:42 pm
Location: Communist State of Maryland, United States.

Re: Effect of British 17-Pounder on Tiger Armour

Post by jackalope »

Does anyone here know why Tiger armor was harder to get through then any other? If you'd take Tiger armor the same thickness as normal armor the Tigers armor was stronger, anyone?

I do but I'll see if anyone else does too. ;)
User avatar
PainlessWolf
Lieutenant-Colonel
Posts: 7668
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:09 pm
Location: Southern Colorado Rocky Mountains

Re: Effect of British 17-Pounder on Tiger Armour

Post by PainlessWolf »

Good morning, Jack,
Why was the Tiger's armor stronger? The effect of Legend! *chuckles * probably not, it was more likely the amount of nickle in the steel. You can see from the picture above that the round from the 17 pdr did not shatter the steel, so much as deform it due to the armor's malleability.
regards,
Painless
...Here for the Dawn...
User avatar
jackalope
Lieutenant
Posts: 3882
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 7:42 pm
Location: Communist State of Maryland, United States.

Re: Effect of British 17-Pounder on Tiger Armour

Post by jackalope »

I see Mr.Painless knows. :haha:

It was also the only tank ever built to use nickel armor. Well that I've read of anyway.
User avatar
tomhugill
Captain
Posts: 4881
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:21 am

Re: Effect of British 17-Pounder on Tiger Armour

Post by tomhugill »

The lack of which (amongst other alloys) led to German armour apparently being more prone to failure later in the war.
User avatar
dgsselkirk
Warrant Officer 1st Class
Posts: 1508
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:57 am
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Effect of British 17-Pounder on Tiger Armour

Post by dgsselkirk »

High velocity is your friend....
"There are things in Russia which are not as they seem..."
Georgy Konstantinovich Zhukov
User avatar
43rdRecceReg
Major
Posts: 6295
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2015 11:38 am
Location: North West Highlands, Scotland

Re: Effect of British 17-Pounder on Tiger Armour

Post by 43rdRecceReg »

RobW wrote:Interesting. I suspect the shrapnel from the damaged Tiger armour would have been fatal if it's in the occupied space. Was it from the field or a test firing on a range?
Watching a tank DVD lately, I saw an interview with one of the old 'Kameraden', who'd survived Kursk and the curse of the Firefly in Normandy and Belgium. He pointed out that even if a shell didn't entirely penetrate armour, the heat it generated together the flesh shredding shrapnel, were often enough to finish the crew off. He also observed that the screams of men being burned to death in a tank were something you could never ever forget....
As for the pic, it came through on my Pinterest account....after a spot of digging. The leftover lump of tiger looks as if it's in a museum somewhere, and was excised from a knocked out tank with an acetylene torch..I imagine..for further ballistic study. More details were not on offer, unfortunately. :|
"Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please"- Mark Twain.
User avatar
blimp
Sergeant
Posts: 727
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:29 am
Location: Watford , NW Londonistan . U.K.

Re: Effect of British 17-Pounder on Tiger Armour

Post by blimp »

:D found it ! ( not the original link though) 131 wasn't the only Tiger brought back to the UK , the second was put on the range - 17pdr vs PzVI range test the remnants became a 'cutaway' instructional exhibit . B.
to the bouncy room ! Yay !
RobW
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 1218
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 2:55 pm
Location: Sheffield

Re: Effect of British 17-Pounder on Tiger Armour

Post by RobW »

Makes sense to use special steels, and shows how advanced the German armour was. Does also raise the question re armour thickness that are always spoken of - ie how do you compare differing slope and composition for effectiveness? Eg would the KT with similar materials have been mostly immune to the 17pdr?
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”