Challenger 2

Feel free to discuss anything and everything to do with tanking here!
User avatar
Woz
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 1322
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:06 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Challenger 2

Post by Woz »

I was thinking of printing another smaller turret ring with the teeth inside and use the Sherman type elevation unit with a large gear on it. I'm going to be dropping the BB unit for recoil and IR and making it 360 so I won't need to worry about anything hanging below the turret.
User avatar
jarndice
Colonel
Posts: 8399
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:27 am
Location: the mountains of hertfordshire

Re: Challenger 2

Post by jarndice »

Can somebody tell me the difference between the Challenger 2 @ £149.99 and the Challenger 2 @ £179.99 ? :crazy:
Both from the same dealer.
shaun.
I think I am about to upset someone :haha:
mcevoyi
2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 2294
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:24 pm
Location: Now Living in Cyprus .... Modellers desart ...

Re: Challenger 2

Post by mcevoyi »

I think it's just he pain work
I can't see any other difference ...
ALPHA
Major-General
Posts: 10960
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:06 am

Re: Challenger 2

Post by ALPHA »

Got one Question.....How much difference is the chassis dimensions on this Chally compared to the Centurion :shifty:
Aside from the skirts...they look awfully similar :shifty:
Image
Image
If close enough....could there be some possible Centurion conversions pop up in the future :shifty:

:D


ALPHA
User avatar
Tankbear
Lieutenant
Posts: 3001
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 12:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Challenger 2

Post by Tankbear »

Woz wrote:I was thinking of printing another smaller turret ring with the teeth inside and use the Sherman type elevation unit with a large gear on it. I'm going to be dropping the BB unit for recoil and IR and making it 360 so I won't need to worry about anything hanging below the turret.
Hi Woz

I tried using a smaller turret ring gear on a vintage tamiya conversion I was doing and found the motor could not turn the turret ring. It appeared that because I had moved the turning point away from the circumference of the turret sit in circle the motor was just pushing the turret to the side rather than rotating. If that makes sense.

Ian,
www.mad-tanks.weebly.com
www.rctankelectronics.com
www.rc-truck.weebly.com
www.rc-boat.weebly.com
DNAR
Lance Corporal
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2015 3:44 pm
Location: Hastings, United Kingdom

Re: Challenger 2

Post by DNAR »

ALPHA wrote:Got one Question.....How much difference is the chassis dimensions on this Chally compared to the Centurion :shifty:
Aside from the skirts...they look awfully similar :shifty:
Image
Image
If close enough....could there be some possible Centurion conversions pop up in the future :shifty:

:D


ALPHA
H1 Alpha, Centurion chassis is designed in the late 40's if I recall it right, suspension is totally different and as well as the wheels, tracks, idler, sprocket, engine, to sum it up everything.

Challenger lineage started in the late 70's with the Challenger 1 ( after the need for Chieftains replacement ), However even Challenger I differ quite a lot from Challenger 2 (they almost look visually the same from afar) and Challenger 2 is a whole new tank. Dimension wise Challenger's are totally bigger than Centurions.

Could not compare the two MBT's, 2 tanks that looks very good, built on two separate time frame. Even the centurion lineage differs quite a lot with their marks or version, upgrade and engines, armaments, etc.
ALPHA
Major-General
Posts: 10960
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:06 am

Re: Challenger 2

Post by ALPHA »

DNAR wrote:
ALPHA wrote:Got one Question.....How much difference is the chassis dimensions on this Chally compared to the Centurion :shifty:
Aside from the skirts...they look awfully similar :shifty:
Image
Image
If close enough....could there be some possible Centurion conversions pop up in the future :shifty:

:D


ALPHA
H1 Alpha, Centurion chassis is designed in the late 40's if I recall it right, suspension is totally different and as well as the wheels, tracks, idler, sprocket, engine, to sum it up everything.

Challenger lineage started in the late 70's with the Challenger 1 ( after the need for Chieftains replacement ), However even Challenger I differ quite a lot from Challenger 2 (they almost look visually the same from afar) and Challenger 2 is a whole new tank. Dimension wise Challenger's are totally bigger than Centurions.

Could not compare the two MBT's, 2 tanks that looks very good, built on two separate time frame. Even the centurion lineage differs quite a lot with their marks or version, upgrade and engines, armaments, etc.
Thanks for the 411 DNAR :thumbup: ...Weren't some modernized for use in Dessert Storm?....The configurations look awful close...and even if the two are decades apart...I can see it opens doors for the creation of a Centurion...Especially by some of the skilled modellers who have mastered the art of 3D printing ;)

ALPHA
mcevoyi
2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 2294
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:24 pm
Location: Now Living in Cyprus .... Modellers desart ...

Re: Challenger 2

Post by mcevoyi »

Yes alpha
12 were modified cents .. the 165mm AVRE ...potentially quite a big build ...
ALPHA
Major-General
Posts: 10960
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:06 am

Re: Challenger 2

Post by ALPHA »

mcevoyi wrote:Yes alpha
12 were modified cents .. the 165mm AVRE ...potentially quite a big build ...
Possible though ..right Mcevoyi? ;) ...I can see a great scratch builder like you taking the chassis (bogies sprockets and all)...and building a dead solid Centurion :D ...The other Fynsdad....that guy did cool things ...especially converting HLs ;)

ALPHA
mcevoyi
2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 2294
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:24 pm
Location: Now Living in Cyprus .... Modellers desart ...

Re: Challenger 2

Post by mcevoyi »

I am waI ting for hl to pop the centurion ....
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”