Tiger 1 driver's vision port

Feel free to discuss anything and everything to do with tanking here!
cupoftea
Corporal
Posts: 261
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:36 pm
Location: South Wales

Tiger 1 driver's vision port

Post by cupoftea »

Gentlemen - a quick question if I may...

I notice that the early Tiger 1's had two periscope holes above the driver's vision port for use in combat when, I presume, the driver's vision port was closed. My question is did the vision port remain open at all times when these periscope holes were done away with? Just curious to know how the vision port was used after the holes ceased to be a feature.

Many thanks for any help.
User avatar
DavidByrden
Corporal
Posts: 300
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 6:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Tiger 1 driver's vision port

Post by DavidByrden »

The port was not a simple "open or shut" device. Its upper and lower portions were moved by a single handwheel, so the gap could be adjusted continuously.
Without the Kff2 vision device, Tiger drivers had no choice but to open the port slightly in order to see forward. Except, of course, that they could put their head out the hatch.

David
User avatar
mike1268
Corporal
Posts: 335
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2015 9:28 am
Location: Grantham - Lincolnshire

Re: Tiger 1 driver's vision port

Post by mike1268 »

Although if they put their heads out of the hatch, they cant drive. You cant reach the controls and look out of the hatch of a tiger I.
User avatar
DavidByrden
Corporal
Posts: 300
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 6:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Tiger 1 driver's vision port

Post by DavidByrden »

Really? I haven't tried that. Have you?

David
User avatar
jarndice
Colonel
Posts: 8432
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:27 am
Location: the mountains of hertfordshire

Re: Tiger 1 driver's vision port

Post by jarndice »

I am trying to work out why a Tank manufacturer would fit a hatch for the driver if he was not able to drive the Tank while looking through the hatch, what would be the point?
Installing a hatch in a Tank body is not something that is done without a lot of thought,
Any opening in the Tank body weakens the structure rather like putting a hole in an egg.
shaun
I think I am about to upset someone :haha:
User avatar
PainlessWolf
Colonel
Posts: 7794
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:09 pm
Location: Southern Colorado Rocky Mountains

Re: Tiger 1 driver's vision port

Post by PainlessWolf »

Good morning,
I think that we had this discussion in here before. The driver controls and seat are to the right of the hatch opening so the driver has to sit on the ledge to the left or something there to put his head out of the hatch?
regards,
Painless
...Money!? What's that!?...
User avatar
DavidByrden
Corporal
Posts: 300
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 6:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Tiger 1 driver's vision port

Post by DavidByrden »

Why yes, we had this before.

Image

Since I don't have lengthwise measurements of where the pedals are, this is only partially useful.
But there are plenty of wartime photos of crewmen apparently doing this.

David
cupoftea
Corporal
Posts: 261
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:36 pm
Location: South Wales

Re: Tiger 1 driver's vision port

Post by cupoftea »

Interesting - thanks for the replies chaps.
User avatar
tanks_for_the_memory
Sergeant
Posts: 501
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:50 pm
Location: London

Re: Tiger 1 driver's vision port

Post by tanks_for_the_memory »

Ah yes. We have indeed been here before...

I would love to have a definitive answer.

David I thought you had been inside the Bovington Tiger? Surely you can tell us if it's physically possible for an average sized bloke to drive while sticking his head out? Assuming he wasn't using some clever set up to push the pedals and steer at the same time...
My Mid-Production Normandy Tiger 1 build thread: http://www.rctankwarfare.co.uk/forums/v ... =22&t=8350
User avatar
wibblywobbly
Major
Posts: 6396
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 9:30 am
Location: South Wales Valley
Contact:

Re: Tiger 1 driver's vision port

Post by wibblywobbly »

Drivers view in a Tiger tank.

Tiger 1 Late
Panther G
King Tiger
M36 B1
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”