Man, THAT is a cool looking tank!
I'm in love again...
?

Hi Shaun, those overhangs don't make up the armour of the turret they're just body panels for want of a better word.jarndice wrote:When I saw the first pictures of the full size prototype, in concert with any soldier who has had to fire a shoulder mounted anti-tank weapon at a Tank I smiled at the apparent "Shot trap" between Body and Turret,
Nothing like giving an infantryman a chance against the latest technology![]()
Not exactly fish in a barrel but I reckon 1 in 3 shots should do the job! shaun
Assuming the warhead doesn't go off instantly it'll still focus the projectile into the gap. Think the Israelis put chains on the Merkava?tomhugill wrote:Hi Shaun, those overhangs don't make up the armour of the turret they're just body panels for want of a better word.
That's the way I saw it. No crew in the turret, and weak turret armour. Crew in the hull, compartment is heavily armoured. Missile hits a 'shot trap' or anywhere else on the turret, and the turret disintegrates, a blast will take the path of least resistance, so no more shot trap for a second hit, but the crew and running gear are safe, so the tank is still mobile and can get to safety with a trained crew ready to jump into another tank. The Russians aren't daft, they rethought the tank design from the ground up. Less weight, less fuel, longer range.tomhugill wrote:My point was its not really a shot trap because it's not armoured, it's only a thin layer which I would imagine be easily penetrated rather than cause a deflection of the incoming round/missile. Look at the front of the leopard a5 onward, that looks like one heck of a shot trap but I very much doubt the brains behind the tank would have designed it thus.