1944 M4A3 105mm

ALPHA
Major-General
Posts: 10960
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:06 am

Re: 1944 M4A3 105mm

Post by ALPHA »

scalawag wrote:Yep cloth belts were around too, usually for the .30Cal. Nowhere near as common as the metal links, and I suspect by '44 they were really very rare indeed. More common in the USMC early campaigns I believe. A bit of a hang over from WWI when nearly all MGs used a cloth belt.

Image
Thanks for verifying the cloth belts Scalawag :thumbup: ...I knew they used them... :D ...it might not be "period" but at least a viable solution for Painless to make some nice belts for that Tamiya 50

The draw back is it still would be a lot of work...I can't even imagine working down 5 200 rnd belts :lolno: :crazy:

ALPHA
ALPHA
Major-General
Posts: 10960
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:06 am

Re: 1944 M4A3 105mm

Post by ALPHA »

By the way Scalawag... nice Photo... your own collection? :shh:

ALPHA
scalawag

Re: 1944 M4A3 105mm

Post by scalawag »

yeah making 200 round belts would be time consuming :'( .

Fortunately you only need a belt long enough to cover from the loading gate on the M2 and across one layer in the tin. I think the longest I have made is about 25 rounds. That was the 7.92mm for the MG34, it needed to be a bit longer because of the extra distance from the gun to the gurtsack. :thumbup:

Unless of course you want to display a loose belt, but they are very awkward things when out of the box, so I don't think would be taken out very often :D

I wish they were part of my collection, but sadly no :'( . Just research pics i have picked up along the way :)
User avatar
palepainter
Sergeant
Posts: 564
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 4:04 am
Location: Lafayette, CO

Re: 1944 M4A3 105mm

Post by palepainter »

Strips of black or metallic vinyl, or even electrical tape would possibly work to simulate the metal links.
sassgrunt
Sergeant
Posts: 747
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 9:08 am
Location: Hawaii, USA

Re: 1944 M4A3 105mm

Post by sassgrunt »

I have tried different solutions for .50 cal ammo. One of the more promising was to use 1/6 scale 5.56 ammo, which comes with separate links.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/TB63-03-1-6-Dr- ... 1e85d1d3f3

It seemed like a pretty good idea at the time, but the links are grossly oversized, and didn't look good at all. There also used to be an accessory pack for 1/18 figures, and it had a separate ammo belt for an M2 in that scale. It wasn't bad, but it still looked like a string of rubber/plastic linked ammo. Impact also makes individual rounds, and I asked them if they were also considering eventually making the links for them. But, they said no.

And the search goes on...
User avatar
PainlessWolf
Lieutenant-Colonel
Posts: 7560
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:09 pm
Location: Southern Colorado Rocky Mountains

Re: 1944 M4A3 105mm

Post by PainlessWolf »

46th Day: Tonight was electronics night and sadly, I was limited to an hour when I needed two. I satisfied myself with swapping out all the plugs on the two RX-18s and unscrewing all of the switches and the pot so that they could be remounted in the back under the engine bay grills. It was interesting to set aside the receiver board with it's attendant antenna wire and crystal. I now have a complete RX-18 set with #1 crystal that I will have to think up a use for. I do have two old Tiger 1s and my Pershing which could all benefit from an almost direct swap out. More thought required. Back to the Sherman at hand, I will try to mount the speaker in the back there as well to make the best out of the clearer sound from the Taigen speaker. We will see, I have to sleep on a mounting plan and come back to it tomorrow. Pictures:
Attachments
A pattern begins to emerge
A pattern begins to emerge
A wiry mess
A wiry mess
Electronics night
Electronics night
...Here for the Dawn...
User avatar
PainlessWolf
Lieutenant-Colonel
Posts: 7560
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:09 pm
Location: Southern Colorado Rocky Mountains

Re: 1944 M4A3 105mm

Post by PainlessWolf »

47th Day: Some items anticipated in the post now, optical fiber rods to complete the bow .30 cal and yet one more bit for the turret. Tonight was Electronics Night #2 and I spent it cleaning up the lower hull and sealing off the slots for switches and the pot. I have figured out a way to mount the switches, now I need to make sure that the airgun will clear the components off to either side of it when the main gun is elevated and the turret rotating. The fan on the RX-18 is a nifty idea but it makes the board more cumbersome than it should be...Pictures:
Attachments
Crystal slot cut down and filed smooth and sealed with a plastic card with velour on one side for cushioning
Crystal slot cut down and filed smooth and sealed with a plastic card with velour on one side for cushioning
Crystal slot cut down and filed smooth and sealed with a plastic card with velour on one side for cushioning.JPG (92.1 KiB) Viewed 2037 times
Old and empty selection switch slot on the lower hull sidewall sealed off
Old and empty selection switch slot on the lower hull sidewall sealed off
Old and empty selection switch slot on the lower hull sidewall sealed off.JPG (82.88 KiB) Viewed 2037 times
Switches and sound pot hole sealed off with plastistruct
Switches and sound pot hole sealed off with plastistruct
More Electronics Fun
More Electronics Fun
...Here for the Dawn...
scalawag

Re: 1944 M4A3 105mm

Post by scalawag »

Hi Painless,

I have fitted one of these systems in two shermans and found the best way to mount the MFU with the fan on is to pop off the bottom plastic cover and replace it with insulation tape. It will then fit in the same gap that the old rx18 did between the battery box and hull side.

This is actually a ploy that Taigen use to fit one of these into their Pzr IV where space is very limited for the MFU. They come from the factory with no bottom plate on the MFU and with the bottom of it hot glued directly to the hull.

Another way would be to leave the bottom plate intact and remove the fan. The fan looks great but I have run these units with no fan with no problem what so ever. They don't seem to overheat anyway. I wonder if it is perhaps a bit of a sales gimmick or only necessary for the very heavy tanks which will draw more current when moving. It is all extra draw on battery power whether it is serving a purpose or not :)

I suspect other solutions may require removing the battery box and having some sort of quick release system for the upper hull to remove the battery. I have moved on now to other control systems but this still seems the best option for MFU mounting.

With the switches I swapped the main switch for a mini toggle switch which is positioned in the rear hull plate above the left track. When the top hull is in place the switch cannot be seen at all, but is still relatively easy to operate. The smoker switch I don't need now as I am using the IBU2 board which has the smoker controlled from the TX. The speaker pot I upgraded to a better quality one with a metal base and hot glued it direct to the hull.

Hope there might be something you can use there :thumbup:
User avatar
PainlessWolf
Lieutenant-Colonel
Posts: 7560
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:09 pm
Location: Southern Colorado Rocky Mountains

Re: 1944 M4A3 105mm

Post by PainlessWolf »

Good Morning, Scalawag,
Those are all excellent ideas. I will end up going one of those directions . It was that or lose the airgun capability which I kind of like having. This gun is a good one. Thank you, Sir.
regards,
Painless
...Here for the Dawn...
scalawag

Re: 1944 M4A3 105mm

Post by scalawag »

:D My Pleasure Painless, glad to of been of help.
Post Reply

Return to “Sherman”