Tamiya Sherman
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:39 pm
Hi folks,
Just a couple of fotos of the stripped Sherman for you to view, and a few observations.
As some of you know, I bought the tank second hand with extras like metal tracks and full 4 channel rc kit, a real bargain too. Since buying it, I have been looking at it while waiting for the battle system to arive from USA and wondering what needs doing to it.
I realised that I knew nothing about the tank cos I never built it so I thought it best to take it apart.....as you do!
In the process I have knocked a few bits off, and stuck them back on, whilst deciding on a plan of action. And then I noticed that it had been painted in the wrong colour....this may sound a daft statement to some of you but this is my first allied tank so the colours are new to me.
This tank had been painted khaki not drab olive so out came the paint and compressor. In the process of preparing the shell for painting I knocked a few more bits off.... and stuck them back again. Now we have a propper allied paint scheme of Tamiya drab olive matt.
I must say that this tank is incredibly fragile unlike the HL series which I and my grandchildren abuse constantly. The rabbits tend to chew things too but nothing has fallen off the HL jobbies apart from the Tiger rear mudflaps which just clip back on. My observation is that the Tamiya Sherman is a super model but has very fragile sticky out bits. If I had made this tank I think that I would have left all these fragile bits in the box cos I am woried about taking it along to a club weekend which potentialy means more damage. Tamiya use hard plastic where HL must use recycled washing up bowls, Tamiya is thin and HL is the thickness of the washing up bowl. In future I think I will stick to HL as I can chuck 'em in the boot and if I break something off I know there is enough meat to glue onto again if necessary.
I am very fortunate that finantially I am ok, I can afford this hobby, and could afford to buy Tamiya all the time but comparing the two makes I will stick to HL cos I cant see the difference adding up to £300.
The wierd RC control stick movements confuse me too. Why didn't Tamiya put all tank direction movements on one stick and let you have the other for turret and cannon control. My heli controls are on one stick as are all my boats so why have Tamiya decided to go this wierd way? I hope that I can move the rcvr plugs and get it my way...
Dont get me wrong, the Tamiya Sherman is a super tank to look at, and it sounds amazing, but I am dumbfounded with the full retail price.
Enuff moaning...I always wanted one and now I have got one and cant wait to get it back together and running round the garden.
(The pics showing the tank with tracks are pre new paintwork)
I bet this post proves to be controversial and gets quite a few comments.....so go on shoot me....
Mike
Just a couple of fotos of the stripped Sherman for you to view, and a few observations.
As some of you know, I bought the tank second hand with extras like metal tracks and full 4 channel rc kit, a real bargain too. Since buying it, I have been looking at it while waiting for the battle system to arive from USA and wondering what needs doing to it.
I realised that I knew nothing about the tank cos I never built it so I thought it best to take it apart.....as you do!
In the process I have knocked a few bits off, and stuck them back on, whilst deciding on a plan of action. And then I noticed that it had been painted in the wrong colour....this may sound a daft statement to some of you but this is my first allied tank so the colours are new to me.
This tank had been painted khaki not drab olive so out came the paint and compressor. In the process of preparing the shell for painting I knocked a few more bits off.... and stuck them back again. Now we have a propper allied paint scheme of Tamiya drab olive matt.
I must say that this tank is incredibly fragile unlike the HL series which I and my grandchildren abuse constantly. The rabbits tend to chew things too but nothing has fallen off the HL jobbies apart from the Tiger rear mudflaps which just clip back on. My observation is that the Tamiya Sherman is a super model but has very fragile sticky out bits. If I had made this tank I think that I would have left all these fragile bits in the box cos I am woried about taking it along to a club weekend which potentialy means more damage. Tamiya use hard plastic where HL must use recycled washing up bowls, Tamiya is thin and HL is the thickness of the washing up bowl. In future I think I will stick to HL as I can chuck 'em in the boot and if I break something off I know there is enough meat to glue onto again if necessary.
I am very fortunate that finantially I am ok, I can afford this hobby, and could afford to buy Tamiya all the time but comparing the two makes I will stick to HL cos I cant see the difference adding up to £300.
The wierd RC control stick movements confuse me too. Why didn't Tamiya put all tank direction movements on one stick and let you have the other for turret and cannon control. My heli controls are on one stick as are all my boats so why have Tamiya decided to go this wierd way? I hope that I can move the rcvr plugs and get it my way...
Dont get me wrong, the Tamiya Sherman is a super tank to look at, and it sounds amazing, but I am dumbfounded with the full retail price.
Enuff moaning...I always wanted one and now I have got one and cant wait to get it back together and running round the garden.
(The pics showing the tank with tracks are pre new paintwork)
I bet this post proves to be controversial and gets quite a few comments.....so go on shoot me....
Mike