Page 1 of 1

Interesting mod on the Abrams

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2025 7:54 am
by MrChef
I do tend to find obscure and interesting mods on tanks and armored vehicles when I'm bored.

So I grabbed these pics from a video showing this mod on the real Abrams. Of note the video maker is an active duty Abrams tank commander. He goes on to share that this mod is an interesting subject and there doesn't seem to be a rhyme or reason that some Abrams have them while others do not. He also explains that they are there for exactly the reason you'd expect to keep the tracks from skipping off and de-tracking altogether.

Image

Image

The more you know...

Re: Interesting mod on the Abrams

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2025 7:16 am
by tankme
The track retaining rings were actually on the earlier version of the Abrams. I have seen them mounted on a few modern Abrams. I guess there are a few tank commanders that think they still have a benefit and knowing the Army there is probably a stockpile of them somewhere in a warehouse orderable through FedLog (ordering system for the military and government) with an NSN (National Stock Number) associated with them. I had an early Tamiya 1/35 M1 Abrams tank kit when I was a kid that had the retaining rings on the sprockets. When in the Army, I used to use the FedLog system to order components to fix the electronics equipment and computers I worked on. A single digit NSN mistake in FedLog could change a 1000ohm resistor into a locomotive or an Apache helicopter blade so you were always pretty careful about what you ordered. Pretty much everything had an NSN number.

AI response:

"The Abrams tank stopped using track retaining rings on the drive sprockets because debris like mud and rocks would build up, often bending or mangling the rings and causing the tracks to be thrown off more frequently. The original design of the early M1 Abrams tanks included a partial side skirt and a retaining ring on the drive sprocket, intended to help prevent the track from coming off during tight maneuvers.

However, in the field, this design proved counterproductive for several reasons:

Debris Build-up: Mud, dirt, and rocks would get caught between the sprocket and the retaining ring/skirt, packing tightly. This buildup put excessive strain on the system and could even shear the sprocket bolts.

Increased Track Throwing: Instead of keeping the track on, the mangled or clogged ring often became the direct cause of the track being thrown.

Maintenance Issues: When a jam occurred, the skirt and ring made it more difficult and time-consuming for the crew to access and fix the problem in a combat situation. Ultimately, the Army found that modifying the side skirt design to allow debris to eject more easily eliminated the need for the problematic retaining ring, leading to its official removal and discontinuation in later variants. "