Page 1 of 3

Lee-Enfield No4 Mk1 no1 sniper rifle vs Mauser K98 BYF...

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2021 7:27 pm
by 43rdRecceReg
This is a very entertaining shootout, in an unusual format, from an articulate and enthusiastic marksman. :thumbup: It's also very well filmed. You can enjoy following the parabolas the rounds follow, on the way to the target. :D You don't have to be a gun-nut to enjoy this. It's also eye-opening, useful, background info for anyone interested in WW2 snipers- and on how deadly they could be.
Having had a go with my boy's No 4 Mk 1 Lee--Enfield (with iron sights- minus the 'scope), I found it to be pretty accurate. :thumbup:
phpBB [video]

I'd say it's worth 28mins of your time :wave:

Re: Lee-Enfield No4 Mk1 no1 sniper rifle vs Mauser K98 BYF..

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2021 10:39 pm
by jarndice
The Mk 4 was replaced by the SLR but it's pressed mild steel breech block cover precluded the fitting of a sniperscope so until a proper replacement could be found the Mk4 was still to be found in armouries long after their official withdrawal.

Re: Lee-Enfield No4 Mk1 no1 sniper rifle vs Mauser K98 BYF..

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 4:47 pm
by Timbo68
The Mk4 was/is an excellent target rifle. I used them a great deal in the 1960s in my teens at Bisley and elsewhere. I’m always amused by the pundits who discuss and display their prowess at accuracy while using rests and telescopic sights, when all we had was a sling wrapped around the arm (with elbow pads) and iron sights. The backsights were a bit better than standard - Parker-Hale bridge sights with 4 clicks per minute adjustment. 2 sighters, and 7 rounds to count, with at least 5 bullseyes and 2 inners at 500 yards required for any kind of success in competition. I don’t think my eyes would be up to it now, though… B|

Re: Lee-Enfield No4 Mk1 no1 sniper rifle vs Mauser K98 BYF..

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 5:02 pm
by jarndice
A proper set of iron sights should be the norm for any military infantry rifle but if your target is a mile away then a scope is the only option along with a spotter with a decent set of field glasses.
A decent infantry rifle is a non existent sight in any armoury today, now it is assault rifles that shortsightedly try to be both a rifle and a submachine gun and of course it falls short on both counts.
But the bean counters like them because they use one type of ammunition instead of two.

Re: Lee-Enfield No4 Mk1 no1 sniper rifle vs Mauser K98 BYF..

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 12:56 pm
by Lenny Warren
Sigh, miss my Enfield. I was a target shooter through my youth... well, actually from my teens until my 40's.

Mainly .22LR for short range, Martini Henry based, then onto an Anschutz Supermatch 54 which I had for years and years.. lovely rifle.

For long range, I had a LE No. 4Mk2 converted to 7.62mm NATO by Fultons of Bisley. I shot it upto 600 yards locally, but had to travel to shoot 1200 yards. Guys in the club always prefered Mauser actions upto 600 yards and Enfields upto 1200.

Happy days... :)

Re: Lee-Enfield No4 Mk1 no1 sniper rifle vs Mauser K98 BYF..

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:34 pm
by 43rdRecceReg
Lee-Enfield Mk IV- muzzle blast
Lee-Enfield Mk IV- muzzle blast
If you click on the pic, Lenny, it will ENLARGE it. This is me blasting away with my son's Lee-Enfield, in Switzerland. (He has enough weaponry to equip a platoon, but the Swiss are relatively laid back about gun ownership, and for good reason: everybody owns one, pretty much, but fatal shootings are as rare as rocking-horse s**te. :think: ). Up here in the Highlands, I have to pay the Police £70 for a licence for my Walther air rifle (and it's the required sub- 12ft lb type... :/ ).

For nostalgia's sake, here are the instructions for firing the MK 3:
Image
This weapon's still in remarkably good condition (1943 vintage). I wish I could say the same for me (I'm 71 :| :D ). They were very well made, and not outsourced to China. :haha:
Image

Re: Lee-Enfield No4 Mk1 no1 sniper rifle vs Mauser K98 BYF..

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:38 pm
by 43rdRecceReg
Image
I meant to include this pic. Whilst using a taut strap for support when in a standing position, or kneeling, I'd always look for a convenient tree or post to lean against if possible- if used (legally) away from the range.
Hitting something at 300 mtrs when standing certainly takes a steady stance. :D

Re: Lee-Enfield No4 Mk1 no1 sniper rifle vs Mauser K98 BYF..

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:07 pm
by 43rdRecceReg
I'm a keen follower of the genial Hickok's gun-trials, and his infectious enthusiasm for weaponry. Along with the Forgotten Weapons (Ian McCollum) channel, this is one of my favourites.
Here's Hickok with a No. IV Lee-Enfield, displaying a certain reverence for this legendary WW2 weapon (justifiably, in my opinion). :thumbup: :wave:
phpBB [video]

Re: Lee-Enfield No4 Mk1 no1 sniper rifle vs Mauser K98 BYF..

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:22 pm
by DymondTank
The blunder bust

Re: Lee-Enfield No4 Mk1 no1 sniper rifle vs Mauser K98 BYF..

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 11:55 am
by Jarlath
My Enfield with an aftermarket scope mount.
Plenty fun, but .303 is getting pricey nowadays and my reloaded brass is getting worn out...

Image