Page 1 of 2

E-100 photo

Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2015 9:10 pm
by MichaelC
Hi all,

Can someone verify this photo or is it Photoshopped ?
h1.jpg
MichaelC

Re: E-100 photo

Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2015 9:14 pm
by KTRob
Looks wrong to me, the lighting on the tank is somehow out from the other vehicles in the scene.

I have read in the past, the Germans built a single incomplete prototype E100, which was taken back to GB for evaluation then scrapped.

Re: E-100 photo

Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2015 9:17 pm
by MichaelC
That's what I thought too, and the details seems inconsistent also, but boy the E-100 certainly looks its parts though.

Re: E-100 photo

Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2015 11:20 pm
by billpe
Photoshopped.

Re: E-100 photo

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 1:01 am
by jackalope
DEFINITELY photo shopped!

Re: E-100 photo

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 8:38 am
by billpe
That is the same hull the British carted off then scrapped.

Re: E-100 photo

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 8:55 am
by edpanzer
Kiaser wrote:Just for interest had a big talk about this a while ago the U.S. took a functioning unit tested and stripped it , my understanding is that there was more than one and here is the proof . :thumbup:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44IWaZrBcXo

The engineering was so advanced no wonder they where keen to get there hands on it and how we have used the technology , jet engines and rocket advancement and including sat communications .

I have to agree the photo has a element of photo shop manipulation .
Kiaser we (the British) already had jet technology

Re: E-100 photo

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:45 am
by wibblywobbly
The Brits had created a jet engine pre-war, but when the war came along it was a matter of mass production of reliable aircraft.

By the end of the war we were looking at a different ballgame.

The Centurion had already been developed and was about to go into production?

The Germans were always ten steps ahead though:

http://www.militaryfactory.com/ships/de ... -XXI-Uboat



Add V2 development and the atomic bomb, long range supersonic bombers that could reach the USA, and the war had to be won when it was, as within months we would have had nothing to fight back with.

Re: E-100 photo

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 11:24 am
by billpe
There was only one E100 hull unless you can find some evidence that contradicts Jentz and Doyles exhaustive research which is, no offense, incredibly unlikely as you'd be going up against people who've spent their lives researching this.

Re: E-100 photo

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 11:53 am
by edpanzer
wibblywobbly wrote:The Brits had created a jet engine pre-war, but when the war came along it was a matter of mass production of reliable aircraft.

By the end of the war we were looking at a different ballgame.

The Centurion had already been developed and was about to go into production?

The Germans were always ten steps ahead though:

http://www.militaryfactory.com/ships/de ... -XXI-Uboat



Add V2 development and the atomic bomb, long range supersonic bombers that could reach the USA, and the war had to be won when it was, as within months we would have had nothing to fight back with.
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/jet_engine.htm
Let's be honest here the jet in the 262 was rubbish very unreliable and often needing replacement after one flight sir franks was far superior out of the box and while I'm sure looking at the German jet was interesting I doubt much was learned.