Ad Lav wrote:Lots of work done here!
I may have missed why, but could you explain why you didn’t mod the Tamiya hull which had the correct engine deck?
It's not absolutely correct, Adam, as it's the one for the IDF M4, which doesn't quite have the same profile as the one for the M4 105mm model. Yes, the engine deck's similar- but not the pattern I actually wanted.
The
real reason, though, is that I'd
already begun work on the HL hull, when the AAF Museum told me the 105 hull wasn't in stock. So...I just carried on with the HL M4A3, figuring the Tamiya shell wouldn't be obtainable- despite having ordered it. I used Woz's Shapeways engine deck instead.
Then..the Tamiya hull appeared weeks later
To use a modern idiom it's complicated'.
I guess, I shall just have to use the Tamiya hull for another project. Interestingly, it's made of a far superior plastic to the HL one- which appears to be somewhat fibrous.
Edit: put another way, Adam, the IDF upper hull has the wrong rear plate, and the engine deck is of a slightly different pattern to the M4 (105) Tamiya. What more, the glacis angle is also 47deg, like the M4A3, and I needed 57- which I now have on the HL hull. More glaringly, the diameter of the aperture for the Turret is far greater on the Tamiya, than the HL. All in all, then too much work.
A bit of a waste, considering shipping. The problem is, Tamiya parts are really becoming rather scarce.

"Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please"- Mark Twain.