Tamiya Jagdpanzer IV

Up to the end of WWII.
jtracks
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 1209
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 4:00 pm
Location: Roseville, CA.

Re: Tamiya Jagdpanzer IV

Post by jtracks »

Ad Lav wrote:Very nice! Great looking td!
Thank you, it's been a fun build so far. A little disappointed in all of the plastic pieces for the barrel traverse. I can see possible failures in the future. The plastic elevation arms for one. Also, the gunners site ties into the barrel traverse mechanism and moves as the gun moves so no need for a servo here but I wish it were all metal. They are a different shape than what I'm used to (elevation and traverse arms) and I couldn't find any metal arms that might work. I'm going to make a wish list and forward it on to Bob at ETO Armor when I'm finished.
Joe
jtracks
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 1209
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 4:00 pm
Location: Roseville, CA.

Re: Tamiya Jagdpanzer IV

Post by jtracks »

magman wrote:Looking good,I like it. :thumbup:
Thank you magman. Still plenty of painting to finish and then on to the mechanicals.
Joe
User avatar
Ad Lav
Captain
Posts: 4247
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 4:44 pm
Location: Kent

Re: Tamiya Jagdpanzer IV

Post by Ad Lav »

Panzer iv has a specific upgrade elevation arm.
User avatar
HERMAN BIX
Major-General
Posts: 11371
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:15 am
Location: Gold Coast,Australia

Re: Tamiya Jagdpanzer IV

Post by HERMAN BIX »

jtracks wrote:
Ad Lav wrote:Very nice! Great looking td!
Thank you, it's been a fun build so far. A little disappointed in all of the plastic pieces for the barrel traverse. I can see possible failures in the future. The plastic elevation arms for one. Also, the gunners site ties into the barrel traverse mechanism and moves as the gun moves so no need for a servo here but I wish it were all metal. They are a different shape than what I'm used to (elevation and traverse arms) and I couldn't find any metal arms that might work. I'm going to make a wish list and forward it on to Bob at ETO Armor when I'm finished.
Is it the kind of thing a printed set would make sturdier ?
If you design the better section and print it, perhaps the bits can be made stronger but easier than metal ?
HL JAGDPANTHER,HL TIGER 1,HL PzIII MUNITIONSCHLEPPER, HL KT OCTOPUS,HL PANTHER ZU-FUSS,HL STuG III,HL T34/85 BEDSPRING,
HL PZIV MALTA,MATORRO JAGDTIGER,HL F05 TIGER,TAMIYA KT,HL PANTHERDOZER,HL EARLY PANTHER G,TAIGEN/RAMINATOR T34/76,
HL AN-BRI-RAM SU-85
jtracks
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 1209
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 4:00 pm
Location: Roseville, CA.

Re: Tamiya Jagdpanzer IV

Post by jtracks »

HERMAN BIX wrote:
jtracks wrote:
Ad Lav wrote:Very nice! Great looking td!
Thank you, it's been a fun build so far. A little disappointed in all of the plastic pieces for the barrel traverse. I can see possible failures in the future. The plastic elevation arms for one. Also, the gunners site ties into the barrel traverse mechanism and moves as the gun moves so no need for a servo here but I wish it were all metal. They are a different shape than what I'm used to (elevation and traverse arms) and I couldn't find any metal arms that might work. I'm going to make a wish list and forward it on to Bob at ETO Armor when I'm finished.
Is it the kind of thing a printed set would make sturdier ?
If you design the better section and print it, perhaps the bits can be made stronger but easier than metal ?
Maybe so Herman, hadn't thought of that. I've not tried any 3D printed parts. Might be worth a try.
Joe
User avatar
HERMAN BIX
Major-General
Posts: 11371
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:15 am
Location: Gold Coast,Australia

Re: Tamiya Jagdpanzer IV

Post by HERMAN BIX »

Just a thought, there are print-nerds out there and in here that may be able to deliver the dream so to speak !
I have no idea about the material or potential strength of print product, but I am sure the advice will come from those that do.
The likes of Shapeways should be able to square things away for you.
HL JAGDPANTHER,HL TIGER 1,HL PzIII MUNITIONSCHLEPPER, HL KT OCTOPUS,HL PANTHER ZU-FUSS,HL STuG III,HL T34/85 BEDSPRING,
HL PZIV MALTA,MATORRO JAGDTIGER,HL F05 TIGER,TAMIYA KT,HL PANTHERDOZER,HL EARLY PANTHER G,TAIGEN/RAMINATOR T34/76,
HL AN-BRI-RAM SU-85
jtracks
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 1209
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 4:00 pm
Location: Roseville, CA.

Re: Tamiya Jagdpanzer IV

Post by jtracks »

Thank you for the idea, I may contact Shapeways.
Joe
User avatar
tanks_for_the_memory
Sergeant
Posts: 501
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:50 pm
Location: London

Re: Tamiya Jagdpanzer IV

Post by tanks_for_the_memory »

Hi J,

Good to see someone plunging into the new Tamiya Jagdpanzer IV.

I just spotted it - but what happened to your earlier pics?

The L/70 gun was indeed very long - especially for such a low-slung vehicle. I read in a biography of a driver / gunner on these tanks (who was actually a Canadian of German descent who went to enlist in the Wehrmacht and then returned home at the war's end) that the barrel length was a real problem. Any obstruction had to be given a wide birth and it was not uncommon for the gun to be knocked out of alignment if it hit anything.

I'm not surprised to hear that the stick-on zimmerit is worthless. I have used it on Tamiya's 1/35 scale models where it just about works, but I cannot see it convincing in 1/16...

Tanks
My Mid-Production Normandy Tiger 1 build thread: http://www.rctankwarfare.co.uk/forums/v ... =22&t=8350
jtracks
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 1209
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 4:00 pm
Location: Roseville, CA.

Re: Tamiya Jagdpanzer IV

Post by jtracks »

tanks_for_the_memory wrote:Hi J,

Good to see someone plunging into the new Tamiya Jagdpanzer IV.

I just spotted it - but what happened to your earlier pics?

The L/70 gun was indeed very long - especially for such a low-slung vehicle. I read in a biography of a driver / gunner on these tanks (who was actually a Canadian of German descent who went to enlist in the Wehrmacht and then returned home at the war's end) that the barrel length was a real problem. Any obstruction had to be given a wide birth and it was not uncommon for the gun to be knocked out of alignment if it hit anything.

I'm not surprised to hear that the stick-on zimmerit is worthless. I have used it on Tamiya's 1/35 scale models where it just about works, but I cannot see it convincing in 1/16...

Tanks
I don't know what happened to the photo's, I'll try to re-load them. Thanks for letting me know.
I enjoy hearing and learning about these WWII tanks. I belong to a veterans club where I live. Plenty of WWII vets still there and even one tanker who was a Sherman driver. I never get tired of his stories. Thank you for your reply.
Joe
jtracks
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 1209
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 4:00 pm
Location: Roseville, CA.

Re: Tamiya Jagdpanzer IV

Post by jtracks »

A little more done. I like the track armor now that it's painted. I don't think I'll leave it on when I drive the tank.ImageImageImage
Joe
Post Reply

Return to “Other”