Page 3 of 8

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 2:24 am
by tao
Thanks for the input! Really sounds like a great tank..visually and mechanically!

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 5:59 am
by tao
How do you think the 90 mm gun stacked up..about on par with 88 KwK L56 but less than KwK 43 L71 in Tiger II?

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 6:00 am
by tao
How do you think the 90 mm gun stacked up..about on par with 88 KwK L56 but less than KwK 43 L71 in Tiger II?

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 7:50 am
by tomhugill
From what I've read I would say so

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 5:22 pm
by Dr Phibes
Ah, I stand corrected - no doubt I confused with some other tank or statistic. Crikey only 187 eh, that's doesn't seem a lot at all.

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Posted: Wed May 04, 2016 3:29 am
by tao
Do you think the stock paint color is good and just weather it or would you suggest bare metal and start from there?

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Posted: Wed May 04, 2016 6:49 pm
by Dr Phibes
tao wrote:Do you think the stock paint color is good and just weather it or would you suggest bare metal and start from there?
Personally I am glad I opted for the bare metal version. Not much is saved by getting the painted version, apart from the time and cost of the painting itself of course. However, even though this tank comes with some very good, and sometime quite excellent, detail and features there are still a number of areas that, for me, need attention/modding, depending on how far you want to go naturally.

As already mentioned it appears the barrel lock needs to be moved to the correct position on the rear. Moreover, I have found quite a few (small) areas of rough casting, and quite a bit of flashing on suspension units needs removing and generally cleaning up. I also found small but visible gaps between the lower turret and the upper section which are screwed together. The gaps needs filling here, as well as a few other places, and there are also missing weld lines here and there.
I also have in mind a number of further detailing mods so, for me, it is just as well I got the bare metal version as a lot of re-painting would have been in order anyway. On the other hand you may just prefer a ready out of the box painted finish and there is nothing wrong with that.

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Posted: Wed May 04, 2016 7:46 pm
by tao
I see two positions for the gun lock?

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Posted: Wed May 04, 2016 8:49 pm
by tomhugill
tao wrote:I see two positions for the gun lock?
Top pictures the m36b2 which is on the m10 hull. Second pictures where it needs to go.

Re: M36B1 Tank Destroyer question

Posted: Wed May 04, 2016 9:10 pm
by tao
Thanks Tom!