3:1 gearbox Mato or Asiatam?

Feel free to discuss anything and everything to do with tanking here!
User avatar
Tankbear
Lieutenant
Posts: 3001
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 12:00 pm
Contact:

Re: 3:1 gearbox Mato or Asiatam?

Post by Tankbear »

Sorry for taking so long to get back online, sun came out so ended up sorting the garden till late. :'(
blimp wrote:Are these the gearboxes you were looking at ? The ' NEW H/L brass gear 3 to 1's ' - made by Mato and came with the adaptor plate , leads need soldering on . I like 'em .Image
Link http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ... K:MEWAX:IT" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Looks simular and have to solder leads onto the motors.

Also are these http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ... K:MEWAX:IT" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The upgrade 3:1 HL ones you mention?

So overall the Asiatam ones seem to be better option to work out of the box with out issues.
www.mad-tanks.weebly.com
www.rctankelectronics.com
www.rc-truck.weebly.com
www.rc-boat.weebly.com
User avatar
blimp
Sergeant
Posts: 727
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:29 am
Location: Watford , NW Londonistan . U.K.

Re: 3:1 gearbox Mato or Asiatam?

Post by blimp »

Yup , they look like the doggies . - The new Heng Long 3 to 1's described are really the revised Mato type .
to the bouncy room ! Yay !
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”