Jimster wrote:Nice picture! My only Sig is a P320 in.45acp. Civilian version of our army’s M17 except I prefer .45 over 9mm because I reload that caliber for my 1911s.

Very tasty.

Hmmm... that would be perfect for making holes for plant bulbs in the Spring.

Much easier than using a dibber!
My lad now has a Chinese 1911. It takes a PhD to reassemble it!. Fires well though. Of his latest acquisitions, I like the WW2 Tokarev TT33 (?)- a tanker's weapon;
and the Beretta '92. the Beretta's almost as perfect as the P225. Then there's the Glock 17- the latest. I don't trust any weapon without a manual safety- despite the Glock's safety feature.
The Enfield (No 2 Mk 1- 0.38) revolver in the pic is stamped 'R.A.F' 1939. It's a pleasure to shoot, but lacks stopping power. It's a sort of shrank-in-the-wash Webley.
The idea, initially, was to collect available working WW2 rifles and sidearms and compare them. His enthusiam for the lastest special forces stuff has rather taken over lately, however.
I appreciate well designed, and well-made bits of engineering. That includes weapons- though I'm inclined to think there are too many of them in the world.
I'm also a big fan of Ian McCollum's 'Forgotten Weapons' channel. He's very articulate and knowledgeable, and someone whom I feel examines the engineering and inventiveness aspects of weaponry, rather than glorifying their killing and maiming properties. I created a thread on WW2 Tanker's weapons (sidearms and close defence) a few years ago....
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrfKGp ... e68dzXgJuA
"Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please"- Mark Twain.