Page 2 of 3
Re: Another foray.
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2017 10:50 pm
by Artyfist
That is fantastic!!
I wish my electrics could deal with it.
A static would suit me
Re: Another foray.
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2017 11:55 pm
by c.rainford73
That's very cool. I'd like an automated German tank commander for a few projects

Re: Another foray.
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 12:09 am
by B_Man
Looks good. I'm interested.

Re: Another foray.
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 12:14 am
by Max-U52
Rad_Schuhart wrote:Ausf, dont send it to Max or to Jackalope. They are in the US and you know that the post service there works great.
But what about shipping to Austria? This might be your first parcel there, so you might be curious how long it takes and all the stuff.

If you Gomers don't stop glommin' on to my scam I'll have to pull all the hairs out of your noses, one at a time!!
I was here first!
Seriously, though, these look really great Jeff and I can't wait till you get them into production, especially the German Commanders. The only reason I need to know the price is so I'll know how many I can afford to buy.
Re: Another foray.
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 10:06 am
by Vanguard
https://youtu.be/ONS58Loi5QY when's this guy coming into production Jeff lol
Re: Another foray.
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 11:05 am
by ausf
A static version of that one very soon, but with a better sculpt.
That was pretty complex, with a linear servo in the torso on a gimbal. Unfortunately, those micro linear servos are not reliable, a literal spec of dust can trip them (trust me, I've used them in Ultra Micro AC and have had many crashes due to ailerons locking after flying on the deck over dirt).
If I ever get a chance at the bench, I plan on using Arduino to animate an entire Tiger I skeleton crew with opening/closing hatches, etc.
I could produce a skeleton TC with side to side head movement and maybe some rudimentary head lifting, or one that just looks up and down as if he's searching for the Typhoon that got him, but the side to side with lift is out.
Re: Another foray.
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 2:07 pm
by Vanguard
Hey Jeff I thought that was a one off couldn't help posting though it's well cool, just the bulk standard is still outstanding work Jeff, can't wait till I can't get a German commander off of you,

.
Re: Another foray.
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 2:10 pm
by c.rainford73
This figure is awesome! Need a fully automated crew for my Nashorn

Re: Another foray.
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 3:55 pm
by philipat
That looks great. A static would suit me, too, since my electronics can't control it.
Two questions:
1) would it work in the Pershing as well as the M4?
2) any thought to hollowing the goggles so it is just the frame? I ask because you could paint the helmet through them and then make clear lenses by drawing clear Elmer's school glue across the frames to make the lenses. (technique I learned recently) That would give them some depth. Maybe there is a better way...
Re: Another foray.
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 4:56 pm
by ausf
philipat wrote:That looks great. A static would suit me, too, since my electronics can't control it.
Two questions:
1) would it work in the Pershing as well as the M4?
2) any thought to hollowing the goggles so it is just the frame? I ask because you could paint the helmet through them and then make clear lenses by drawing clear Elmer's school glue across the frames to make the lenses. (technique I learned recently) That would give them some depth. Maybe there is a better way...
I can't say because I don't have a Pershing. The Sherman TC leaning out of the hatch fits the cast M4 hatch, I'm not sure of whether the Pershing uses the same hatch. The animated guy only really interacts with the hatch with his left arm, so I would think unless the Pershing hatch is narrower, he'd be fine. I'm not up on my US armor, but I'd assume the production line manufacturing of US tanks would mean the hatches, cupolas, etc are interchangeable whenever possible, especially since they are cast parts.
In terms of goggles, I prefer what you are asking, cutting clear styrene to fit is tough, but the recess can be filled with a host of different materials, like Vallejo water effects, or Testors Krystal Klear. Problem is though, not everyone has the ability or want to fill them, so I'd have to provide the clear lenses, so it's easier to just cast them solid and the end user can paint them tinted and a Gloss topcoat.
Detail like that is worked into figures for the painter/collector market, but the price is 2 to 3 times these.