Re: Scratchbuild reinforcement..
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 8:48 pm
Thanks Alwyn 

RC Tank Warfare community modelling hobby forum
https://www.rctankwarfare.co.uk/forums/
https://www.rctankwarfare.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?t=22232
That's a pretty smart looking tool, Gary...more like an instrument, in fact...and much less messy than a sable brush. It also resembles one of those Botox syringes beloved of Hollywood stars with immobile facesMax-U52 wrote:If the plastic weld is thin enough you might want to take a look at this gizmo
http://www.micromark.com/Touch-N-Flow-A ... wAod62MJ4A
I use it for static models, mainly aircraft, and it works really well with that capillary action you like, Roy. I use it with Tamiya thin cement and it flows right along places like fuselage and wing seams. So how thin is the plastic weld?
I'd assume it's either 2-butanone or dichloromethane, both of which are worse for you than acetone is!AlwynTurner wrote:EMA is the real deal when it comes to scratch building as it partially melts both surfaces and results in a truly bonded surface almost instantly. As you have identified it's pretty strong and I suspect that there's more than a smidgeon of acetone in the 'glue' which would account for the melting/bonding, so beware the fumes.![]()
Just been checking the likely side effects of using Dichloromethane, or Methyl Chloride (it is the active chemical agent in EMA, and in the US versions:'Tenax and 'Ambroid Pro Weld'). Apparently, it was used in paint-stripper concentrations, by workers re-finishing bathtubs. It's said to be responsible for thirteen deaths in that trade.Raminator wrote:I'd assume it's either 2-butanone or dichloromethane, both of which are worse for you than acetone is!AlwynTurner wrote:EMA is the real deal when it comes to scratch building as it partially melts both surfaces and results in a truly bonded surface almost instantly. As you have identified it's pretty strong and I suspect that there's more than a smidgeon of acetone in the 'glue' which would account for the melting/bonding, so beware the fumes.![]()
Reports I've just looked at are conflicting; if you live in the States that is. Some states have banned it, while others suggest there's no evidence of MEK (Butanone) having carcinogenic risk factors. Apparently it occurs naturally in food (small amounts), but we are also exposed to it through car exhaust emissions, cigarette smoke, paints and varnishes etc. This Pdf from the UK Gov says there is no data to suggest a link with cancer.pebblemonkey73 wrote:MEK was banned years ago as it was found to be carcinogenic, I used to use "MEK substitute" when I was a lithographic printer.
its pretty strong stuff and would have to be used in a well ventilated area.
MAtt