Perhaps, if this is a success, Tamiya may be encouraged to produce a WW1 Mk IV, or a Churchill. 
The Centurion is widely regarded as one of the best tanks ever made, and so it's only fitting that the premier model tank maker should include it in its inventory.
I think you did´nt take a close look at the Centurion.Rad_Schuhart wrote: Problem with the display kit is once you add the gearboxes, recoil, elevation and rotation you are in the price range of the full kit. So that is why I think is better to buy the entire tank and sell the electronics.
Man, you have another issue then. All those problems are as easy as programming your radio! You can use one stick for driving and another for turret, and for sure no need to touch the trims at all and neither ninja stick movements, not with the newer or with the older electronics!tankme wrote:
Not trying to find faults as I think the electronics are fine for those that like them. What I don't like about the Tamiya setup is the two stick driving. I would rather have driving on one stick and turret on the other. I realize you "can" do it on the older system by moving the servo leads around, but that is not ideal. I also prefer a switch or rotor to fire the gun and not a sequence of stick movements. These are preferences I have.
The servo lifting mechanism in the Cent is a step forward to simplify the older Tamiya system. How the tank is controlled is what I am most curious about. Does the Sheridan still use the two stick driving method with the stick sequence to fire the main gun and the machine guns?
Nah, mostly because they cost as much as tank itself and many people prefer to buy another model with stock electronics than elmodjarndice wrote:I don't think most people are satisfied with the Heng Long/Taigen stock sounds they just either have never heard better sounds or do not know how to access them
I would love to put elmod or beier to all my tanks but with 1/3 average salary of Brits of Germans (with the same prices) it's tough 
Yeah, Beemers and Bimmers have us over a barrel, but you should see Porsche! Great cars, but OUCH!jarndice wrote: Now we have to see how much it will cost and Tamiya being like BMW who have a nasty habit of producing a base model with the sort of high value extra cost fittings that other makers include as standard.
Taking into account the heated discussion on all forums and Facebook groups, we will see many variants and modificationsKaczor wrote:HERMAN BIX wrote:Wonder how many will end up being Shot-kal's or Vietnam Australian versions once they get about the community ?
What makes you think they won't be simulating the meteor engine?jarndice wrote:Taking into account the heated discussion on all forums and Facebook groups, we will see many variants and modificationsKaczor wrote:HERMAN BIX wrote:Wonder how many will end up being Shot-kal's or Vietnam Australian versions once they get about the community ?
I'm not into post war tanks but it's good to see a new kit from major player.[/quote)
I am guessing that no one including Tamiya will be simulating the RR Meteor Main engine ( A converted 12 cylinder Merlin aero engine) or the Morris 8 four cylinder side valve engine which was fitted to provide power to the radios and batteries.
And that highlights the failure of the 1/16 R/Cs scale' inability to detail large items in such vehicles.
