i need to draw some up and print some off for a project i working on
thanks




 That will keep you out of mischief over the Christmas period, but do heed Wayne's warning about the glass...
 That will keep you out of mischief over the Christmas period, but do heed Wayne's warning about the glass... 
You know, Roy, I was thinking about Wayne's misadventure, and realizing I'm way too backwards to avoid such a calamity, I got a printer that doesn't have a glass print bed.43rdRecceReg wrote:Very nice, Gary.That will keep you out of mischief over the Christmas period, but do heed Wayne's warning about the glass...
 
   
  
 Max-U52 wrote:You know, Roy, I was thinking about Wayne's misadventure, and realizing I'm way too backwards to avoid such a calamity, I got a printer that doesn't have a glass print bed.43rdRecceReg wrote:Very nice, Gary.That will keep you out of mischief over the Christmas period, but do heed Wayne's warning about the glass...


If the quality is as good as I hope I think I can put together a file to print 6 or 8 tail lights at once, and I have a feeling a few guys will want some. Which brings up a question - You all know I'm not in this to make any money, but would it be out of line to suggest a donation if I print something for you? I mean a bit extra beyond the cost of the print itself. Whatever a guy thinks is fair and wants to kick in to keep the R&D going in Detroit. I think there will be plenty of detail parts, like mirrors, that I can send worldwide for just a few bucks and you know I'll beat shapeways by at least 75% so am I wrong thinking it's a good thing for me to keep going down this road? And it's not like we're a huge market, I'm just talkin' 'bout the fine lads here at the forum. But resin definitely costs more than filament. A kilo of filament is about $35 for quality TPU, where a kilo of flexible resin is 80 bucks. Ouch. Hopefully we'll find out if it's worth it tomorrow. Same Bat Time, same Bat Channel.
And I still need drivers! An RC truck (in motion) with no driver just looks wrong!!

 
 
 .
 . .
 .
