Porsche vs Henschel King Tiger

Feel free to discuss anything and everything to do with tanking here!
User avatar
PainlessWolf
Lieutenant-Colonel
Posts: 7405
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:09 pm
Location: Southern Colorado Rocky Mountains

Re: Porsche vs Henschel King Tiger

Post by PainlessWolf »

Good afternoon,
I will answer in the form of a photograph. ;o)
regards,
Painless
Attachments
...and this is before the upcoming lower hull replacement and paint job...
...and this is before the upcoming lower hull replacement and paint job...
...Here for the Dawn...
User avatar
Raminator
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 1267
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2015 9:57 am
Location: Newcastle, Australia

Re: Porsche vs Henschel King Tiger

Post by Raminator »

The Porsche KT turret is just as much of an abomination as the Porsche Tiger. Ferdinand should have stuck with engineering and left design to his son.
User avatar
Tiggr
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 819
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2016 6:19 pm
Location: North Wales near Chester

Re: Porsche vs Henschel King Tiger

Post by Tiggr »

Son of a gun-ner wrote:
Tiggr wrote:
jarndice wrote: And yet still the most practical Supercar you can buy.
Shaun.
If you can keep the tail end on the road.........
Obviously later models with 4 wheel drive and controlled traction and added weight over the front wheels have overcome this serious design flaw.
How was it a design flaw? Before the latest electronic gizmos and 4wd, porche were trouncing the opposition, especially unpredictable mid engine cars on the track in production races, that's why so many were sold for racing, and why they ended up with so many different race classes, when I used to follow British touring car and production racing around the country, the 'design flawed' porche cornered astoundingly well (obviously wasn't in touring car races, support races and their own races on other weekends). One only has to look back at the stats of their old two wheel drive cars to see it. And now with 4wd, they're even better.

Mick.

Yes Mick - they all had big lead weights over the front wheels to compensate for the huge pendulum effect the rear mounted engine had.
Like I said - flawed engineering.
Tiger 1 Early Taigen,
Tiger 1 Mid Torro,
Tiger 1 Late Taigen,
King Tiger Taigen (P)
Jagdtiger Torro
King Tiger (H)
King Tiger Torro (H)
Tiger 1 late Torro
Panther G Taigen
User avatar
jackalope
Lieutenant
Posts: 3885
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 7:42 pm
Location: Communist State of Maryland, United States.

Re: Porsche vs Henschel King Tiger

Post by jackalope »

Tig, I said the exact same thing! LOL! Understeers like a garbage truck on ice heading down a hill! LOL!
User avatar
Afrikakorps
Corporal
Posts: 250
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 1:40 am
Location: Australia

Re: Porsche vs Henschel King Tiger

Post by Afrikakorps »

Well, it really is love'm or hate'm isn't it. :thumbup: or :thumbdown:

:haha: :haha: :haha:
Panzer III G
Sherman M4A3 (105)
T-34/76 (1942)
Panzer IV Wirbelwind
Sturmtiger
KV-2
M26 Pershing
T-34/76 (1943)
KV-1
M3 Lee
Ferdinand / Elephant
M16 Half-track
Panther G
M4a1 (75mm)
M41 Walker Bulldog
JS-2
M4a3e8 (76mm)
Japanese Type94
FT-17
Tiger 1
User avatar
jackalope
Lieutenant
Posts: 3885
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 7:42 pm
Location: Communist State of Maryland, United States.

Re: Porsche vs Henschel King Tiger

Post by jackalope »

No the Porshe turrets were left over from the failed Tiger I prototype by Porsche. They found the turret could handle the L71 gun so it was mated to the Tiger II lower hull. Thats also where the Ferdinand/Elephant lower hull came from, they were left overs from the failed Tiger I prototype. Germany was in such need for ANY armor they used whatever they could.

Porsche cars are very very nice, not perfect but nice.
User avatar
jarndice
Colonel
Posts: 8017
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:27 am
Location: the mountains of hertfordshire

Re: Porsche vs Henschel King Tiger

Post by jarndice »

Hi Mick,
We had this discussion on modern Tanks with what I perceived as Shot traps,
I was universally, excuse me, shot down with my comments,
Apparently these are not "Shot Traps",
Yeah Right !!
Shaun.
I think I am about to upset someone :haha:
User avatar
Afrikakorps
Corporal
Posts: 250
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 1:40 am
Location: Australia

Re: Porsche vs Henschel King Tiger

Post by Afrikakorps »

I have read a lot and heard a lot said about the Porsche turret being a "shot trap", but also read that it was more costly and time consuming to produce than the Henschel turret. Either way, Porsche was not the winning candidate for the the final production run.

Can anyone show me a photograph of a Porsche King Tiger that was knocked out because of the turret "shot trap" ?

Thanks
AK
Panzer III G
Sherman M4A3 (105)
T-34/76 (1942)
Panzer IV Wirbelwind
Sturmtiger
KV-2
M26 Pershing
T-34/76 (1943)
KV-1
M3 Lee
Ferdinand / Elephant
M16 Half-track
Panther G
M4a1 (75mm)
M41 Walker Bulldog
JS-2
M4a3e8 (76mm)
Japanese Type94
FT-17
Tiger 1
User avatar
BarryC
2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 2468
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 11:43 am
Location: Savannah, GA. USA

Re: Porsche vs Henschel King Tiger

Post by BarryC »

Not being a "true" fan of the King Tiger though it was truly an awesome weapon and arguably the zenith of WWII tank design.
IMO the Porsche turret is much better looking than the "flat" manteled Henschel turret.

Barry
"Details make perfection, and perfection is not a detail."
Leonardo Da Vinci
User avatar
jackalope
Lieutenant
Posts: 3885
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 7:42 pm
Location: Communist State of Maryland, United States.

Re: Porsche vs Henschel King Tiger

Post by jackalope »

Son of a gun-ner wrote:
jackalope wrote:No the Porshe turrets were left over from the failed Tiger I prototype by Porsche. They found the turret could handle the L71 gun so it was mated to the Tiger II lower hull. Thats also where the Ferdinand/Elephant lower hull came from, they were left overs from the failed Tiger I prototype. Germany was in such need for ANY armor they used whatever they could.

Porsche cars are very very nice, not perfect but nice.
I'll give you a couple of copied and pasted quotes from the tank museums literature.
"the Porsche design; VK45.02(P) was BASED on the earlier rejected design for the Tiger I with enhanced armament"
And.
This turret, frequently, and incorrectly named, the ‘Henschel’ turret, was much easier to build as it eliminated many of the complicated curved forgings and extensive machining which the original turret had demanded. The slightly sloped front plate of this new turret also eliminated the shot trap which had existed on the old design and had the benefit of providing greater internal turret room space allowing 86 rounds of ammunition to the Porsche designed turret’s 80.

Mick.

BASED on left over turrets that were modified to fit the L71. I read the same thing, however also read that the ones that were made from the left over never finished Tiger I prototype. Again thats also where the Ferdinand and Elephant got there lower hulls from.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”