7.0 Challenger 2 support bearings

This board is for talk about tanks after WW2. The ups and downs. The ins and outs. All of it here.
User avatar
KH3DP
Recruit
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2022 12:12 am
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

7.0 Challenger 2 support bearings

Post by KH3DP »

I apologize if this has been asked an answered. If it has, please feel free to point me to the other thread and delete this one.

I have a 7.0 Challenger 2. Two upgrades I'd like to do right away are metal drive sprockets with anti-slip rings and drive shaft support bearings. I've already found eBay listings for the drive sprockets, but after doing a search and reading several threads, I still have some questions about the bearings.
  1. I've seen listings for bearing holders that show compatibility for either 5.0 or 6.0 models (not both).
    However, I've heard there were some chassis changes between 6.0 and 7.0.
    Is the size of the opening different between the two generations?
    The opening is ~12mm, and I've attached a photo for reference.
  2. If the opening is the same, is there a reason to use a separate bearing holder vs. directly placing a bearing?
    If the opening size is different, would the bearing itself be the same size? Somewhere I saw a suggestion of 12mm O.D., 8mm I.D. 3.5mm thick.
  3. I've seem some threads for other tank models that mention putting a bearing inside the chassis instead.
    Is that something I need to do as well, or is that specific to a different gearbox/chassis design?
Thank you in advance for any assistance.
IMG_0542.JPG
User avatar
KH3DP
Recruit
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2022 12:12 am
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: 7.0 Challenger 2 support bearings

Post by KH3DP »

I'm still curious if the bearing carriers I've seen serve a secondary purpose, or if they're only because v6 and earlier tanks had a different size drive axle opening. I'd appreciate if anyone can answer this.

However, just to share some information, a 12mm O.D., 8mm I.D., 3.5mm thick bearing will fit the drive axle opening of a v7 Challenger 2. I used MR128-2RS deep groove bearings from Uxcell.
IMG_0543-2.JPG
User avatar
tankme
Warrant Officer 1st Class
Posts: 1971
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Elgin, TX
Contact:

Re: 7.0 Challenger 2 support bearings

Post by tankme »

I think the "carriers" were just a holder for the bearings. Personally I would forgo the carrier and just install a flanged bearing.
Derek
Too many project builds to list...
User avatar
KH3DP
Recruit
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2022 12:12 am
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: 7.0 Challenger 2 support bearings

Post by KH3DP »

Well, I feel dumb. Was just going through my manual again, and realized the last two pages were stuck together. You know, the two that start with "How to install the bearing of drive shaft". :/
Aussie
Corporal
Posts: 465
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 11:49 pm
Location: Darwin , N.T. , Australia.

Re: 7.0 Challenger 2 support bearings

Post by Aussie »

DSCN0527.JPG
This one?
Don't get your panties in a bunch , we still got hand weapons and the fifty!
User avatar
Herr Dr. Professor
Lieutenant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 10:48 pm
Location: Southern Wisconsin USA

Re: 7.0 Challenger 2 support bearings

Post by Herr Dr. Professor »

These moments to lead to humor! However, you have actually done me a favor: I have a Challenger (6.0) and I didn't even know the support bearings are available. Now when I turn to the Challenger (and Leopard, and Abrams) I will see if I need to get and install the bearings.
User avatar
KH3DP
Recruit
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2022 12:12 am
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: 7.0 Challenger 2 support bearings

Post by KH3DP »

Aussie wrote:
DSCN0527.JPG
This one?
Yep.
User avatar
jarndice
Colonel
Posts: 8017
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:27 am
Location: the mountains of hertfordshire

Re: 7.0 Challenger 2 support bearings

Post by jarndice »

tankme wrote:I think the "carriers" were just a holder for the bearings. Personally I would forgo the carrier and just install a flanged bearing.
I have been fitting Gearbox output shaft support bearings since my first Tiger 1 always from Dave---www.forgebeartanks.com
That is until I bought a Taigen Panzer 4 metal hull which was not really suited to them so after a bit of reading I fitted "Flanged bearings",
With a little attention to detail and a touch of fettling they are a very good alternative and cheaper.
The only warning I would offer is that because unlike the regular support bearing the flanged version is external so when you fit them do make sure they do not interfere with the tracks alignment,
Hence the fettling :thumbup:
I think I am about to upset someone :haha:
User avatar
KH3DP
Recruit
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2022 12:12 am
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: 7.0 Challenger 2 support bearings

Post by KH3DP »

tankme and jarndice, thank you for your information.

You mentioned making sure the flanged bearings don't interfere with the tracks, that's what concerned me about some of the 3rd party bearing carriers I was seeing. They stuck out quite a bit, and at least on mine, there's not a lot of clearance between the new built-in bearing carrier and the flat spot on the drive axle. I was concerned the ones I'd seen would push the drive sprocket out. If I pick up an older model again, I will use flanged bearings on them.
Ludwig von wigbearer
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 769
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2016 8:57 pm
Location: Retford Nottinghamshire

Re: 7.0 Challenger 2 support bearings

Post by Ludwig von wigbearer »

P1070914.JPG
good morning, heres the flange bearing as fitted to my challenger 2
Post Reply

Return to “Modern Tanks”