Tiger1 cupola change early to late

If you have a tank query and you can't find the answer anywhere else, post here. (TIP - Check for answers in FAQ, use the 'search' facility or even check this board before posting here).

Postby ronnie42 » Mon Dec 02, 2019 9:52 pm

Metal turret the cupola looks like its sitting high . If so should i just use a plastic turret ?
PC025554.JPG
this looks odd
PC025555.JPG
Is this better for hight above turret roof.

ronnie42
Corporal
 
Posts: 335
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 12:00 pm

Postby General Jumbo01 » Mon Dec 02, 2019 10:06 pm

If after checking plenty of photos of real ones, not models, it is too high then would it sit any lower on a plastic turret? There's nothing to stop you filing down both the base of the cupola and the positioning lip of the opening until it sits correctly. Go for it!
User avatar
General Jumbo01
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 806
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2018 8:06 pm
Location: I'm a Londoner that moved to Essex. Says it all really...:(

Postby 43rdRecceReg » Mon Dec 02, 2019 10:35 pm

https://www.taigentanks.com/taigen-parts/tiger1
If you compare the plastic and metal turrets, with the late cupola they look about the same height. That's probably because the moulds are the same.
tag120703.jpg
Taigen late turret-metal
tag120703.jpg (21.22 KiB) Viewed 120 times

tag120701.jpg
Late turret-plastic
tag120701.jpg (23.9 KiB) Viewed 120 times

Sorry, they're a bit blurry; they're enlarged thumbnails.
User avatar
43rdRecceReg
Captain
 
Posts: 4120
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2015 11:38 am
Location: North West Highlands, Scotland

Postby ronnie42 » Mon Dec 02, 2019 10:51 pm

Thanks Plastic is easier to cut away and less strain on the rotation. This was from the Taigen Tiger kit, decided to use a plastic turret on the build.

ronnie42
Corporal
 
Posts: 335
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 12:00 pm

Postby 43rdRecceReg » Tue Dec 03, 2019 4:09 pm

ronnie42 wrote:Thanks Plastic is easier to cut away and less strain on the rotation. This was from the Taigen Tiger kit, decided to use a plastic turret on the build.


In the apparent fervent race a couple years ago, for members to add as much 'metal' to their tanks as possible (and even falling for, and buying, tanks with the 'all-metal' label, that were anything but...) :/ , I put metal turrets on two of my Tigers. With hindsight, I wouldn't have bothered. Plastic ismuch easier to modify, and it puts less strain on the upper hull, geartrain, MFU etc., than its metal cousin.
That said, a truly all-metal (alloy) tank a la Armortek, still probably represents the peak of ownership ambitions for many rc tank modellers, I'd guess. :)
User avatar
43rdRecceReg
Captain
 
Posts: 4120
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2015 11:38 am
Location: North West Highlands, Scotland

Postby ronnie42 » Tue Dec 03, 2019 6:26 pm

Large scale tanks are cheap in comparison to the tank transporter required . If you buy an ARMORTEC you will need a Sprinter van and ramps to take it to the playpark, :S

ronnie42
Corporal
 
Posts: 335
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 12:00 pm

Postby jarndice » Tue Dec 03, 2019 6:46 pm

For as long as we in this hobby upgrade and fix the perceived failings in our Tanks then ABS Turrets and Tank Body's will be the better option,
It is too much like hard work trying to repair any error on a metal Turret or Tank Body and a metal turret on an unreinforced ABS Body is asking for trouble.
A true all metal Tank would make a fine static ornament but I have little time for shelf queens that is why I have forsworn building large scale non RC Models with the exception of models that add to a diorama that includes RC Aircraft and Trucks and Tanks(And a static Motorcycle :haha: ).
User avatar
jarndice
Major
 
Posts: 5507
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:27 am
Location: the mountains of hertfordshire


Return to General Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jarndice and 4 guests