True to scale

If you have a tank query and you can't find the answer anywhere else, post here. (TIP - Check for answers in FAQ, use the 'search' facility or even check this board before posting here).
Forum rules
If your question is electronics related please post it in one of the relevant boards here: viewforum.php?f=31
User avatar
STHV
Corporal
Posts: 252
Joined: Thu May 17, 2018 9:47 pm
Location: Hertfordshire, UK

Re: True to scale

Post by STHV »

General Jumbo01 wrote:With all these facts and figures regarding Panthers, maybe l could ask - the Panther F. When did it see battle? I have read it was in Berlin for the final bash but even that was disputed by someone who claimed it was a G with a prototype F turret. Does anyone here know or can refer me to some reliable text?
Panther Ausf F hulls never recived their Schmalturm's but there are images of a supposed Ausf F hull fitted with a G turret in destroyed Berlin, these are all the same tank as they have identical damage to the front mudguard/fender, I belive it is indeed an Ausf F hull as the rails for the new driver/radio operator hatches are just visible in the second image and the opening of the empty Stg 44 Mg ball looks slightly more square than the Ausf G versions but without clearer images i cannot say for certain if it is an F
Image
Image
Image
Image
Any image of a Schmalturm on a Panther chasis is from initial testing of the first two turrets on Ausf G hulls
Image
Image
This image is the second turret, you can see it does not have the monocular gun sight hole and the rain guard over the mantlet has not been fitted yet
Image
Production Ausf F would not have muzzle breaks due to the new recoil system in the Schmalturm
One thing I find interesting about these images of the trial turrets is that they are using left over early Ausf D tracks
As a side note no Ausf F was ever fitted with steel roadwheels, this was a trial run on the Ausf G only, if the war had progressed further then the F could have had these wheels depending on the results of the trials but likely would have used standard wheels for most of the time

Hope this helps
Panther Ausf D (WIP)
Panther Ausf A mit Brückentafel (WIP)
Panther Ausf G (WIP)
Jagdpanther G2 (WIP)
Tiger II (WIP)
Pz.Kpfw. VIII Maus V2 (WIP)
Pz.Kpfw. II Ausf L (WIP)
Sd.Kfz. 234/2 (WIP)
Leopard 1A4/1A1A1 (WIP)
Turm III (WIP)
VK 45.01 (H) (WIP)
Tiger6
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 1300
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 10:38 pm

Re: True to scale

Post by Tiger6 »

The history of design changes to the Panther is interesting to say the least, in several instances it was the case that the factory ran out of the 'current production' part and asked for a waver to use up old stock, or had to report that the mandated design level part was not available from that factories' supply chain on the date that the change was supposed to cut in.

Also to add: In this day and age there are a whole lot of very talented people producing very high quality fakes out there on the internet, be very sceptical of online image sources ;)
User avatar
General Jumbo01
Warrant Officer 1st Class
Posts: 1763
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2018 8:06 pm
Location: I'm a Londoner that moved to Essex. Says it all really...:(

Re: True to scale

Post by General Jumbo01 »

So...and my research matches yours both, there was never a proper F operational during WW2 and probably not after. Why then are there so many models available in all scales, some depicted as being in Berlin. The model l'm thinking of even has kill rings on the barrel!

Despite all this, my new Taigen ltd ed Panther F is one of the best molded and detailed models l have and drives the best too. Ah well, it's still a great 'what if', had the war run for another 6 months. Does that mean l should build a T34/100 then? ;)
Owner - Fuckleburgh Tank Collection
Tiger6
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 1300
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 10:38 pm

Re: True to scale

Post by Tiger6 »

As long as you don't present that as a real thing, who cares? I have seen a guy on RCU do a couple of 'what if' M41's that have given me some very bad ideas @) @)
User avatar
General Jumbo01
Warrant Officer 1st Class
Posts: 1763
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2018 8:06 pm
Location: I'm a Londoner that moved to Essex. Says it all really...:(

Re: True to scale

Post by General Jumbo01 »

Go on...do it!

Thanks for your help guys. I'll just park it next to my Pantiger. That's not s bad runner either!
Owner - Fuckleburgh Tank Collection
Tiger6
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 1300
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 10:38 pm

Re: True to scale

Post by Tiger6 »

My first tank was a Pantiger. While I've not yet managed to learn how to apply the paint job I want, it is still probably one of the very few Full Option Tamiya equiped examples out there @) @)
Dusty Steppes
Private
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 10:51 pm

Re: True to scale

Post by Dusty Steppes »

STHV wrote:I have spotted some errors in the performance data too
The Panther Ausf D according to this site has a front plate angled back at 35 degrees lol, it should be 55 and there is zero mention of the HL 210 engine despite it being fitted to the first 250 Panthers
It also lists a large number of completely fake vehicles like E-90, E-100 ,Tiger Ausf B and Panther II with a schmalturm and an 88mm
In all fairness 35 degrees measured from a horizontal line is the same as 55 degrees measured from a vertical line.
Post Reply

Return to “General Questions”