Re: Matorro King Tiger
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2021 8:24 pm
Thanks John
Job number one - see if it works!
Job number one - see if it works!
RC Tank Warfare community modelling hobby forum
https://www.rctankwarfare.co.uk/forums/
https://www.rctankwarfare.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?t=31336
Well that's a good start - not sure what they hoped to achieve with 2 speakers, we'll just move on...SimonCornes wrote:Well Tiger, I managed to whip the tracks off - for a change the pins came out of the tracks easily - and there were only two screws holding the top on either side. I was able to cut through the back plate/engine deck join with a scalpel very easily. So it has an RX18 MFU and two speakers!!
No great loss there then.And a smoker with pipes not attached to the exhausts!
Worth a shot, not sure about the mechanics of holding the upper hull to the back plate, you'll probably have to fashion some magnet holders out of Milliput?So I think I need to improve the back plate/ lower hull join and then make a clip to hold the top edge of the hull to the. Backplate. I bought 100 neodymium-whatever 5mm disc magnets yesterday for about six quid so I think magnets are the way to secure the hull in the future.
Pass - if they have bastardised the wiring to get rid of the original Matorro board, then I would carefully check everything before plugging in a known good board - you might find there was a very good reason why this was left as a static modelWould that be a straightforward case of unplug one, plug in the other?
Tiger 1 sound's are as close as you will get - after all its the same engine, buried in similarly sealed metal box, with a similar exhaust system. HL's representation of this is so low fidelity that it won't sound like either one in any case. There's always been a suspicion that they sampled the Tamiya sounds from the MF01, which were recorded from the King Tiger at Samur.I’m not sure if Taigen do a KT soundboard or if they use a Tiger I? If they use a T1 then a V6.0 might be the best replacement?
was that correct? can be poorly expressedJofaur86 wrote:
look between the top of the tracks under the wings of the upper frame, presence of several screws? may be necessary to remove the tracks? for having opened a Sherman, seems to me well that so? of memory
I have to admit, it wasn't you best attempt at EnglishJofaur86 wrote:was that correct? can be poorly expressedJofaur86 wrote:
look between the top of the tracks under the wings of the upper frame, presence of several screws? may be necessary to remove the tracks? for having opened a Sherman, seems to me well that so? of memory
Jofaur's first language is French so what is your excuse ?Son of a gun-ner wrote:I have to admit, it wasn't you best attempt at EnglishJofaur86 wrote:was that correct? can be poorly expressedJofaur86 wrote:
look between the top of the tracks under the wings of the upper frame, presence of several screws? may be necessary to remove the tracks? for having opened a Sherman, seems to me well that so? of memory
But we can understand the meaning
correct, i have to admit, i'm not good at english, i use the google translator, and apologize, even if i try as much as possible to be understandable when writing.Son of a gun-ner wrote:I have to admit, it wasn't you best attempt at EnglishJofaur86 wrote:was that correct? can be poorly expressedJofaur86 wrote:
look between the top of the tracks under the wings of the upper frame, presence of several screws? may be necessary to remove the tracks? for having opened a Sherman, seems to me well that so? of memory
But we can understand the meaning